A Victory for Honest Elections

In 2000, as Democrats were attempting to steal the Presidential election in Florida, an article written by Jon Dougherty and David Kupelian titled "How Democrats Steal Elections" shed light on the tactics used.

Nolan stated, in reference to a local election: "After the election, Democrats 'brought in their junkyard dog lawyers from around the country and basically harassed the local registrar - got in their faces and demanded to handle ballots' - which were of the same type now in dispute in Palm Beach." Mr. Nolan tracked down an attorney, one Tim Downs "Who readily admitted the Democratic strategy" as well as methods.

From the piece: "Downs told me, somewhat tongue-in-cheek, 'You get me within 100 votes and I can steal any election." "The first rule is, you keep counting until you're ahead. And if that doesn't put you ahead, you recount, re-recount - you keep counting until you're ahead." Second, "The more times those ballots are handled, the more chance there is that chads will break loose" and be disqualified.

' now makes 200,000 to 300,000 votes to be within the 'cheatable spread.' Achieving large-scale fraud requires two things: Mail-in ballots and outdated voter rolls.

In Arizona the outdated voter rolls are the subject of the stated litigation.

Democrats like Governor Katie Hobbs and Secretary of State Adrian Fontes are fighting to delay the updating of Arizona's voter rolls, which have over 500,000 registered voters who should be removed, for various reasons.

From the complaint filed for the litigants we have: "Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act, 52 U.S.C. 20507, which requires states to"conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters" Again, from the complaint filed: "a review of other reliable data sources shows that Arizona has between 1,060,000 and 1,270,000 unaccounted-for voters on the state voter rolls.

Put another way: We would have outside Democrat groups fighting, in court to defend a violation of national law by a fellow Democrat.

Both groups would likely proclaim themselves to be simply fighting for voter rights, as well as free and fair elections for all.

If that is true, why would they fight to keep ineligible people on the voter rolls? Fortunately, this past Friday, Judge Dominic Lanza of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona denied this request.

There are also people fighting to maintain voting rolls filled with hundreds of thousands of ineligible voters. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/07/a_victory_for_honest_elections.html