Originally, I was one of seven “experts” selected by Eastman and his attorney, Randy Miller. As experts, we would be able to give our opinions regarding the integrity of the election. However, well financed attorneys for the California State Bar Association (SBA) immediately objected — to every witness. Most of the time, Judge Yvette Roland was eager to oblige the SBA.
Most of the time, Judge Yvette Roland was eager to oblige the SBA. In my case, Judge Roland ignored the fact that I was a veteran auditor and CPA, had written a comprehensive numbers-based book on the 2020 election, had written a book describing 23 ways we can improve our elections, and had published at least 25 articles on the subject.
In the final analysis, Her Honor disqualified most of the defense experts, including defendant John Eastman; Michael Gableman; and Garland Favorito, who has performed extensive election research for more than a decade and has testified as an expert in other courtrooms.
As a result of "The purge," one side would be able to expound on the accuracy and fairness of the election, whereas the other side would not be able to express disagreement.
The president of Judicial Watch, Tom Fitton, took it a step farther in a posting on X: "Kangaroo court proceedings in California to disbar John Eastman, one of the nation's leading constitutional lawyers, for daring to provide legal advice on the Biden election controversy." Fitton hit the nail on the head: across the country, attorneys are facing disbarment and even jail time, simply for agreeing with the assertions of their clients, or for aggressively exploring the legal options available to their clients.
On February 1, 2021 - nearly 3 months after the election - there were still at least 90,000 more ballots cast than identified voters.
In a detailed overview of my data sources and procedures, Eastman's attorney listed 40 different information sources I used so that I could independently verify election information.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/06/my_testimony_at_the_eastman_disbarment_trial.html
No comments:
Post a Comment