" The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California had previously defended LAUSD's jab mandate based on the 1905 Supreme Court decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts to allow states to mandate smallpox vaccinations.
The problem, according to Ninth Circuit Judge R. Nelson, is that smallpox injections, in that case, were deemed to help stop the spread of smallpox, which is not the case for COVID jabs.
mRNA injections aren't "traditional" vaccines - they're a medical experiment Another argument successfully argued by plaintiffs is that mRNA injections do not even qualify as "vaccines" in the first place because they are a new technology.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention actually had to redefine what a "vaccine" is back in September 2021 from a product that "produce[s] immunity" to a "preparation" that supposedly "stimulate[s] the body's immune response.
" "Their complaint's crux is that the COVID-19 'vaccine' is not a vaccine," Nelson said.
"'Traditional' vaccines, Plaintiffs claim, should prevent transmission or provide immunity to those who get them.
Member of European Parliament Rob Roos commented on all these contradictory statements that it was "shocking" and "even criminal" for governments to play along with allowing vaccine mandates and "passports" when Pfizer itself had never even bothered to test the shots for efficacy.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-06-18-court-confirms-covid-jabs-dont-stop-disease.html
No comments:
Post a Comment