Does the FBI label FBI employees who support biology as potential terrorists? Or, is the FBI saying that no FBI employees support the biological basis for sex and gender distinction?
The FBI and local police keep their specific actions, methods, and technologies mostly secret; thus, one cannot say with certainty what occurs after the FBI labels a person as a potential domestic terrorist.
Americans might study the history of the FBI and local police cooperating with the FBI for hints about what might occur after being labeled as a potential domestic terrorist.
While the specific actions and technologies of the FBI and other secretly operating entities are mostly not publicized, there is one U.S. government document which suggests possible actions of the FBI. The U.S. government document is entitled "The Attorney General's Guidelines on Federal Bureau of Investigation Undercover Operations."
The guidelines mention that the FBI is apparently allowed to secretly own and operate businesses and corporations, make "Untrue representations" of other peoples' actions, and engage "In activity having a significant effect on or constituting a significant intrusion into the legitimate operation of a Federal, state, or local governmental entity."
Does the FBI "Engage in activity having a significant effect on" juries, U.S. Congress, the presidency, or the Supreme Court? Does the FBI engage "In activity having a significant effect on or constituting a significant intrusion into the legitimate" national and local elections?
The FBI guidelines apparently also suggest employees and cooperators might "Supply falsely sworn testimony or false documentation in any legal or administrative proceeding" and the FBI and others might commit "Otherwise illegal activity," apparently including "Violence or physical injury to individuals or a significant risk of financial loss."
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/03/the_fbi_s_otherwise_illegal_activity.html
No comments:
Post a Comment