It started out being that we had to stop emitting because our emissions were causing a climate crisis.
The activists could not bring themselves to say that China had to either reduce or stop growing them.
Chinese per capita emissions were low, so they had the right to catch up.
Then China caught up with the EU on per capita emissions, and the argument changed again.
No-one every argued for banning imports from China until they reduced.
On their own view past emissions are irrelevant, per capita emissions are irrelevant, how much wind you install is irrelevant.
We should conclude that the real object of the activists has little or nothing to do with alarm about the effect of emissions on the global climate, or they would be advocating the most effective measures to reduce them.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/03/13/climate-bureaucrats-give-china-a-free-pass/
No comments:
Post a Comment