With no internet, the L.A. Times was everyone's primary source of information, not just for news but for the scores of the games, who's coming in concert, what's on TV, and the weather.
Just as Los Angeles has changed dramatically in recent years, the L.A. Times has also changed.
The endorsement shocked many, though cynics say, "What else did you expect?" To me, it was the Los Angeles Times coming out of the closet and no longer pretending to be L.A.'s newspaper, but the newspaper of the socialist left.
The Los Angeles Times, which appears to no longer be concerned for its readers but rather seeks to advance an obvious political agenda, tells us that what we see and feel in the city is just wrong.
The L.A. Times says "Voters were right to pick him in 2020. They ought to keep him in place for another term." But the truth is Mr. Gascón won in 2020 because no one was paying attention, and he had $2.25 million of George Soros' money, according to the Los Angeles Times, as well as another $1.65 million from the wife of Netflix's executive chairman Reed Hastings.
The Los Angeles Times editorial board labels those who oppose Mr. Gascón as the "MAGA right" or "Right-wing politicians." But in L.A., there is no "MAGA right" or "Right-wing politicians!" I am pretty sure I have never seen a Trump bumper sticker, lawn sign, or flag in L.A. Republicans make up just 17 percent of the electorate! There is not a single Republican on the city council.
The L.A. Times suggests that the surge in crime is a nationwide trend, and writes, "Prosecutorial policies have no short-term effect on crime." The L.A. Times is correct that there has been a surge in crime in all the big U.S. cities which have implemented Gascón/Soros type policies, such as San Francisco, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, and Washington D.C. Cities in Florida and Texas, on the other hand, have not seen such increases.
No comments:
Post a Comment