The case challenges the constitutionality of the Dominion Voting machines, arguing that the touchscreen Ballot Marking Devices fail to create a voter-verifiable ballot because the actual voter intent is contained in a QR code that cannot be read by the voter.
Last year, VoterGA's Ricardo Davis was able to insert himself as a co-plaintiff and retain his own counsel, attorney David Oles, to represent him in this case.
During the proceedings thus far, Oles has been relatively constrained in terms of arguing Davis's case.
The co-plaintiff's team of lawyers, led by David Cross, have gone as far as objecting to Oles during the extremely limited questioning he's been afforded from time to time.
On Monday, during the questioning of UC Berkley Professor Philip Stark, Oles was granted just two questions and some follow-up after a minutes-long sidebar between the judge and almost a dozen attorneys over whether he could ask any questions.
As Oles was asking Prof. Stark about the 17,852 missing ballot images in Fulton County, Cross's team of lawyers interrupted and questioned the relevance to the case.
Yesterday, just before the plaintiffs rested their case to allow the defendants to proceed, Oles was able to proffer evidence to the court from the expert witness declarations of Professors Philip Stark and J. Alex Halderman.
No comments:
Post a Comment