Skip to main content

ESG Investing in “Democratic” Companies

 Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) has been rightly criticized for driving the politicization of American business, and it is hard to think of a more politicized method of evaluating corporations than by their political contributions. This is exactly what the Democratic Large-Cap Core Fund (DEMZ) does. It is worth examining both for the specific companies in its investment portfolio, as well as for how it illustrates an important distinction with respect to ESG investing, even among those who are skeptical of the practice.

The Democratic Large-Cap Core Fund is an exchange-traded fund that invests only in companies that support the Democratic Party.

According to the fund, as of December 2020 approximately 200 of the 500 companies from the index met these criteria-itself an interesting data point-and the fund's portfolio was constructed from that group.

Billing itself as a way for "Democrats to invest" and to "Invest in Democrats," DEMZ promotes its holdings as being "Fossil-fuel free." It also claims that the companies in its portfolio support ESG priorities such as diversity, equity, and inclusion programs; pay their employees a "Living wage"; and pursue "Thoughtful policies on climate change and environmental impact." The fund singles out companies such as AT&T, ExxonMobil, and Lockheed Martin for supposedly being "Republican-supporting" and asserts that corporations run by executives who support Democratic politicians are inherently more profitable.

Several companies on the list are associated with prominent liberal megadonors who give in ways that would not have factored in to the DEMZ fund analysis.

The former CEO and chairman of Progressive-the late Peter B. Lewis-was one of the original funders behind the Democracy Alliance, which subsequently expanded to become one of the largest and most influential left-wing funding networks in the country.

The decision of three New York City pension funds to divest from oil and gas companies in 2021 is the subject of an ongoing lawsuit from plan beneficiaries.

So the bottom line is that while DEMZ might be a product of the ESG-driven rush to politicize American business-itself a significant societal problem-it does not automatically follow that the fund itself is contributing to that problem, provided that it is restricted to private self-directed investors who for whatever reason prefer their investments to be based upon political criteria. 

https://capitalresearch.org/article/esg-investing-in-democratic-companies/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...