Skip to main content

Election Transparency, Accountability, and Inclusion Act Model Law – DailyClout and American Voters’ Alliance

 SECTION 1 – Statement of Purpose:

The state seeks to ensure fair elections by treating all eligible voters and ballots equally, promoting transparency, accountability, and objectivity in election management. The legislature aims to restore faith in the election process, which has been diminished by alterations in process and law and the infusion of private monies and expertise into government management of the 2020 election.

SECTION 2: Definitions:

This section provides definitions for terms used throughout the act, including election management, core government function, ballot management, drop boxes, election machines, voter participation information, ballot harvesting, disability, cloud storage, micro-targeting, party observers, observation, in-kind services, and public record.

SECTION 3. Prohibition of Ballot Harvesting:

Ballot harvesting is prohibited, and absentee ballots must be delivered by the eligible voter, a properly designated person, the United States mail, or a common carrier to a staffed election office or designated receptacle at such office. Any ballot illegally harvested shall not be counted, unless authorized election officials can verify it.

SECTION 4. Voter Identification:

Voters are required to present a valid photo ID to vote. The following IDs are accepted: a driver's license, a current U.S. passport, tribal government identification, IDs issued by colleges, universities, or post-graduate technical or professional schools, a state non-driver's ID card, a U.S. military ID, or a valid state or U.S. government-issued ID.

SECTION 5. Citizen Observation, Transparency:

Election management and ballot management shall be transparent and open to observation by party observers. All contracts by election offices and officials retaining third parties to engage in core government functions, election management, or ballot handling shall be published and subject to state open records laws.

SECTION 6. Maintaining government objectivity:

No local, state, or county office or agency shall accept monies or in-kind assistance from any non-government source for election management or ballot management, unless authorized by the state legislature. Government offices shall not allow electronic access to voter registration records in a manner allowing access by non-government entities or agents for voter registration purposes.

SECTION 7. Absentee Balloting:

The preferred method of voting is in-person voting. Any qualified elector may request an absentee ballot if they expect to be out of the voting jurisdiction on Election Day or have a disability preventing them from voting in-person. Completed absentee ballots may only be returned by the elector, a person designated consistent with this act, a common carrier, an election official, the United States Postal Service, or a law enforcement officer in the official course of an investigation.

Section Eight. The Procedure for Voting by Absentee Ballot:

Return envelopes for absentee ballots must include an affidavit signed by the voter, which contains the signature of a witness or notary public. The oath must inform the elector that he or she is affirming under penalty of law that he or she is a United States citizen, is a qualified elector, and that the information provided is true and accurate. Absentee ballots that are returned but do not comply with this subsection shall not be counted.

Section Nine. Counting the Vote:

The counting of any ballot shall not commence until after the polls close on election day. Upon commencing the counting of ballots, the counting shall continue without interruption until completed.

Section Ten. Violations of this Act, Penalties, and Remedies:

The knowing violation of any provision of this Act by a government official shall be a class A misdemeanor unless otherwise indicated. Knowing violations of this Act in order to benefit a specific candidate, political party, or campaign shall be a class felony. The statute of limitations for violations of this Act shall be 3 years.

Section Eleven. Legislative Standing Committee – formation, powers, and responsibilities:

The legislature shall have standing to intervene as a party in any litigation wherein any other state agency is a party and the action relates to government management of elections. No state agency may settle litigation in a manner which alters the application of any provisions of the election code or this Act without the approval of the legislature when the legislature intervenes or is a party to the litigation.

Section Twelve. Legislative Standing:

The legislature shall have standing to intervene as a party in any litigation wherein any other state agency is a party and the action relates to government management of elections.

Election Transparency, Accountability and Inclusion Act
American Voters’ Alliance / Daily Clout

Download PDF version HERE.

Download a Microsoft Word version HERE.

https://dailyclout.io/election-transparency-accountability-and-inclusion-act-model-law-dailyclout-and-american-voters-alliance/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html
Post a Comment
Read more

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...
Post a Comment
Read more