With President Biden's poll numbers at all-time lows and public polling showing former President Trump consistently leading in 2024, Democrats are scrambling not to win the support of voters but to simply disqualify their opponent through Democrat operatives, attorneys, and judges.
I've been in Denver this week witnessing the latest use of lawfare to defeat Trump in front of Democrat judges instead of American voters.
The judge presiding over their case is Sarah Wallace, a Democrat donor who was appointed just last year by Democrat Colorado Gov. Jared Polis.
CREW's lawsuit wants Wallace to order Democrat Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold - who's pretending to be neutral - to remove Trump from the state's ballot next year.
As Andrew McCarthy wrote in National Review, this section "Refers to electors of the president and vice president, not the president and vice president themselves. Plainly, if it had been the purpose of the amendment's framers to include the president and vice president, they'd have said so - they wouldn't have left it at electors." Furthermore, if it did apply to presidents, President Trump has not been federally criminally convicted of, let alone charged for, insurrection, so he couldn't be disqualified for committing the offense.
Wallace gave $100 last year - two months after the Democrat Colorado governor named her as a state trial judge but before she assumed office - to a group called the Colorado Turnout Project, which says it was created in response to Jan. 6.
The Supreme Court of the United States, with their lifetime tenure and pay protection, may have to put on their big-boy pants, take a Trump case, and do their jobs by correcting this unconstitutional, anti-Democratic, and Republic-ending lawfare by Democrat operatives, attorneys, and judges.
No comments:
Post a Comment