Update: the Journal of Neurology Clinical Practice has not responded to my retraction request as of Fri. Sept. 1.
Story Highlights
- The government funded a great deal of questionable science during Covid.
- It's impossible to do oversight on the studies because the researchers and government are keeping the material secret, despite the fact that the material belongs to the public.
- In a study published in Neurology Clinical Practice, the scientists claim their work supports the idea that Covid vaccines are safe, because everyone in their small sample who suffered neurologic events had risk factors.
- The scientists will not answer how the presence of risk factors exonerates any role of the vaccines in the illnesses, since it is well known that vaccines can aggravate or trigger pre-existing conditions or risk factors.
- Columbia University, where the research was conducted, refuses to release any of the study supporting material, which is contrary to the tenets of good science under which a study must be replicable.
- Though your tax dollars paid for the study, Columbia says it isn't subject to Freedom of Information law because it is a private institution.
- As a result, the government can launder public funds to a private institution to avoid oversight or transparency regarding a publicly-funded study.
- CDC is stalling on a Freedom of Information Act request.
No comments:
Post a Comment