Administrative Terrorism

 In the Congressional Hearing, Grusch branded it "Administrative Terrorism" - which aptly describes both the nature of the attacks and the full impact of how these tactics play out in a person's life - it terrorizes the person targeted.

Parts of the government are slow to deliver on these and Grusch represents a much broader movement to have those aspects of the government come clean now on what has actually been going on.

Sensitive to the issue of PTSD, I spent some time following the discussions online about Grusch's security clearances and his PTSD. I thought the best take came from someone who is equally qualified and operates in the same organizations as Grusch.

Michael has over 20 years in the intelligence community, working with the NSA, NRO and NGIA. These are the same places where David Grusch worked, but he never worked with Grusch.

"The ICIG, the Intelligence Community, did their own investigation into David Grusch's witnesses and what he found. They interviewed, like, forty, plus under oath, and immediately said David Grusch's claim is both credible and urgent."

To date, Grusch's credibility has not been challenged formally by anyone in Government and, as stated by Jeremy, the Intelligence Community Inspector General had deemed Grusch's claims "Credible and urgent".

Jeremy Corbell, Ross Coulthart and George Knapp have said from the very beginning that how Grusch is treated is going to be very important if we want other UAP whistleblowers to come forward and reveal the information that Grusch was only able to intimate at. 

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/administrative-terrorism?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=583200&post_id=136721148&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email