That is statistically impossible if the vaccines are not causing SIDS. You can see Ben Tapper talk about her and her direct testimony.
So now I'm going to take that "Gold standard" data and prove to you it is consistent with what the police detective found: that data would be very hard for anyone to explain if vaccines aren't causing SIDS. The police officer video.
More importantly: vaccines cause SIDS. The peer-reviewed literature backs up her story.
The deaths were much more likely after optional vaccines than required vaccines! Look at the Japanese vaccination program.
The most cases of SIDS should be after the vaccines with the most doses in children from 0 to 1 if the vaccines aren't causing SIDS. But instead, the HiB vaccine, which is optional, has the highest number of deaths, yet both the polio and BCG vaccines are both required vaccines and both have 0 SIDS deaths.
This makes absolutely no sense if SIDS isn't caused by vaccines; the rates cannot depend on vaccine type; it should only depend on which vaccines are given the most under age 1 and be only proportional to the frequency the vaccine is given.
These results can't be explained if the vaccines aren't causing SIDS. Is there evidence the police officer is lying? What is her motivation?
No comments:
Post a Comment