If Special Counsel Jack Smith has his way, election integrity as we know it will be a thing of the past, and all election results in the future will be suspect.
Our work has been necessitated by the doubts raised about election integrity in recent election cycles.
If Smith is successful, political leaders in the future will be so scared of potential criminal charges being brought against them for exercising their lawful, civil right to challenge election results that they will simply keep their mouths shut and let questionable election results go unchallenged.
You know what kind of governments don't allow questions to be raised or challenges to be launched against election results? Authoritarian and totalitarian governments, like the governments of Nicolae Ceausescu in Romania, or Saddam Hussein in Iraq, or Kim Jong Un in North Korea - or like the government of Ugandan dictator Idi Amin, who is reputed to have once said, "There is freedom of speech, but I cannot guarantee freedom after speech." That's really what it's all about, isn't it? Freedom after speech? There must be provisions for elections and election results to be challenged.
Let's not forget former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who challenged the legitimacy of the 2016 election - "Our election was hijacked," she tweeted in May of 2017.
We cannot allow Smith to twist our election process into a charade that does not allow for challenges of election results.
Without the ability to challenge questionable results, the electorate will lose faith in the integrity of not just one election, but the election process itself.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/08/how_jack_smith_is_twist_our_election_process_.html
No comments:
Post a Comment