Subverting The Court

 If the DNC can run up the number of justices on the Court, then it can cement a near-permanent majority, using the Court to legislate.

In the meantime, progressives will try to chip away at how the Court works, in order to advantage themselves.

If four of the nine justices agree, they will issue a "Writ of certiorari" which is an order to the lower court for records of the case, in order to review them.

Interestingly, Fisher recommends that Congress intervene into the Court's management, and change the rule of four, by overruling the Court.

Fisher tells readers that by giving a smaller group in the Court such weight, it would rescue legal injustices made by lower courts: "For the court to reverse a lower court decision refusing to honor a civil liberty, the case first has to be put on its docket. And that seems no longer to be happening in cases involving established rights favored by the liberal wing of the court."

Fisher engages in a logical fallacy by implying that lower court rulings are ipso facto unjust, and are "Refusals" rather than judgements.

It is a doctrine based in centralized single authority, and in this way, reflects their ideological role model: China's CCP. Packing the Court with partisans, and modifying Court rules to favor them, moves the Court inexorably toward a committee. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/07/subverting_the_court.html