Skip to main content

What's Biden Doing With Migrants At The Ports Of Entry?

 As my colleague Todd Bensman and I have both recently explained, much of the focus on what a federal judge has referred to as the Biden administration's "Overarching non-detention policy" for migrants at the Southwest border has shifted to the ports of entry - where the president is attempting to funnel those migrants into the country and hide the resulting disaster from the public.

There are many misstatements of fact in that excerpt, beginning with the assertion that would-be illegal migrants could only schedule appointments for interviews at the border ports of entry once "Title 42 lifted" on May 11.

Returning to the January 5 White House press release and the May 16 CLAP rule, each contends that this funneling of migrants into the United States through the ports of entry is somehow a lawful course of entry.

How's Biden Releasing Thousands of Migrants Monthly at the Ports? Which brings me to the question of what the Biden administration is doing with those migrants who make appointments at the Southwest border ports of entry using the CBP One app.

Here is how the process works at the ports of entry: Any alien who seeks to enter the United States - legally or illegally, and at a port of entry or across the border between the ports - is defined in section 235(a)(1) of the INA as an "Applicant for admission".

CBP officers are not "Arresting" the inadmissible alien applicants they encounter at the ports of entry because they aren't free from restraint either at the ports or during the custody that - under section 235(b)(2)(A) of the INA - should occur thereafter.

What's Biden doing at the ports of entry with the migrants who have made interview appointments under his ludicrous CBP One scheme? I know that he is releasing nearly all of them, but regardless of whether he is releasing them en masse on parole or on their own recognizance, it's not legal.

https://cis.org/Arthur/Whats-Biden-Doing-Migrants-Ports-Entry

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html
Post a Comment
Read more

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...
Post a Comment
Read more