Throughout the pandemic criticism of masks or lockdowns was permissible, if frowned upon, but the vaccines attained an almost exalted status that ensured any critics - no matter the quality of their evidence - were unfairly disparaged as "Anti-vaxxers," "Cookers," or simply ignored.
Governments and experts insisted vaccines stopped transmission when they clearly didn't, even though Pfizer later admitted it hadn't even studied that question.
In October, I wrote to Conny Turni, a scientist at Queensland University, after I read her new assessment of Covid-19 vaccines in the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Immunology.
"An abundance of studies has shown that the mRNA vaccines are neither safe nor effective, but outright dangerous," she and co-author Astrid Lefringhausen concluded, arguing the vaccines presented a greater health risk to young healthy people than Covid-19 itself.
The latest batch of Twitter Files revealed a systematic effort by US government-funded NGOs to remove even true stories of vaccine injuries where they could promote "Vaccine hesitancy." In an Orwellian twist of history, any posts throughout 2021 that warned of vaccine passports, mandates, or argued for natural immunity were removed.
The mountain of bias and ignorance that's weighed on reporting on Covid-19 vaccines is starting to crumble.
It may very well be that the vaccines did overwhelmingly more good than harm, but with proper media scrutiny the harms could have been less.
https://brownstone.org/articles/media-to-blame-covid-vaccines-wall-of-infallibility/
No comments:
Post a Comment