This is one of the many disasters of Barack Obama created during his terrible presidency. Most people know that Obama illegally implemented the DACA program now so much in the news. Democrat are clamoring for Biden to continue violating the law by unilaterally granting amnesty to at least 11 million illegal immigrants now protected from deportation by DACA. Short of that Democrats now in control of Congress will try to pass a law to make it happen before they lose control of the House and possibly the Senate. We have discussed the real unethical reason they want to do this in previous notes... Here are the details of current efforts the criminal Democrats are up to...
That’s despite the effort by “Democrats and immigration activists” to claim that amnesty for illegal aliens who came to the U.S. as children would include criminals. The crimes being found now often relate to being affiliated with criminal gangs or various other arrest records.
According to George Fishman of the CIS, “Despite the successful framing of Dreamers and DACA recipients as young people with no criminal records, it turns out that many were affiliated with gangs and many had to arrest records when granted DACA benefits, and many others saw their DACA status terminated because of criminal activity.”
The revelations about the system being gamed come just as Democrats in Washington are working to give citizenship to DACA program participants – very quickly before they lose control of the U.S. House in January.
Obama set up the program by himself in 2012 when he couldn’t get Congress to do what he wanted.
It protects illegal aliens who arrived in the U.S. as children.
The ultimate goal has been to provide amnesty protection against the laws they broke and to give citizenship to millions of illegal aliens.
While DACA was set up to reject those who had criminal records, actually it is lenient, the report said.
The CIS report said some misdemeanors aren’t deemed significant enough to bar someone from DACA eligibility. And the instructions say the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) may consider granting DACA protections even if someone was arrested or detained and charges were filed.
“If USCIS determines that you have been convicted of a felony, a significant misdemeanor, or three or more misdemeanors not occurring on the same date and not arising out of the same act, omission, or scheme of misconduct, or that you otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety, USCIS is unlikely to defer action in your case, except where DHS determines that exceptional circumstances exist,” the instructions state.
Reports covering 2019 reveal that 7.8% of all approved DACA applicants had an arrest record — 59,786 individuals, of whom 53,792 had a record before approval and 7,814 had a later arrest." Criminal juveniles gaming Obama’s DACA system to get into U.S. (patriotnewsalerts.com) Now tell me how anyone can be proud of what the Democrat party represents???... They are the party of lawbreaking criminals that promote illegal actions (in addition to their own crimes) that actually facilitate illegal alien criminality across the entire country...period.
The more anyone digs into the false narratives and illogical thinking that plagues the Democrats the more out of touch with reality they become. They focus is on all the wrong things. It is a truly pathetic thing to observe. Their green energy nonsense proves to be more nonsensible the more we learn of the inherent flaws of their illogical logic. This item explains just one aspect of the nonsense.
Quote: "Environmental Nihilism – Save the Earth, Not the People. In an article in November’s issue of the journal First Things, theologian and pastor Kevin DeYoung describes as possibly “the most significant thing happening in the world” something that is not happening: people aren’t having children. He observes that the “paradigmatic affliction of the Old Testament” – a woman’s barrenness – has seemingly become “the great desire of nations.” In many developed nations, the sudden antipathy toward having children seems to have a curious if unlikely culprit: the radical environmental movement.
In his piece, DeYoung points to the decline in the total fertility rates (TFR), which have reached sub-replacement levels in virtually every European nation, with numerous major countries like Greece, Spain, and Poland having TFRs of only 1.50, and Italy’s only 1.22, with France alone approximating the replacement level of 2.03. (Since not all children will survive to maturity and thus be able to reproduce, just keeping the population level stable requires that on average, each man and woman will average just over two children.) TFRs in East Asia, he observes, are even lower, with Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan averaging about 1.0. South Korea’s TFR is 0.81, and Japan’s – despite various government pro-natalist policies – is still about 1.7. Finally, although China abandoned its notorious one-child policy (which often led to forced abortions) in 2016 in favor of a two-child policy in 2016 and a three-child policy in 2021, its population shrank in the latter year by over one percent – the first such shrinkage since the (government-induced) Great Famine of 1959-61.
While the United States was long thought to be the exception to the rule of declining populations in the industrialized world, having had a TFR of 2.1 as recently as 2007, DeYoung adds, since that year the U.S. birthrate is reported to have shrunk by 20 percent, to as low as 1.6. Consequently, as Jonathan Last (cited by DeYoung) warned in his 2013 book What to Expect When No One’s Expecting, the world can expect a roster of “Very Bad Things,” including an aging population, shrinking workforce, reduced innovation, and (in DeYoung’s words) “a general disquiet as more and more people get older and sicker with fewer people to care for them” – or pay for their care.
Not all observers, of course, share DeYoung’s and Last’s pessimism. By now, no informed person takes seriously Paul Ehrlich’s prediction in his acclaimed, Nobel-Prize-winning 1968 book The Population Bomb that owing to population growth, the human race would soon experience mass starvation, as the earth’s resources were rapidly depleted. On the contrary, especially thanks to innovations in agricultural productivity, the earth proved capable of sustaining a growing population at substantially higher levels of nutrition in countries like India.
The latest and increasingly influential excuse for promoting unjustified fears of population growth, however, and even aspiring for a permanent decline in human numbers, is the supposed devastation that the world’s population already causes to the environment through climate change and pollution, alongside resource depletion. Hence journalism professor (and recipient of a Macarthur Foundation “genius grant”) Alan Wiseman invited us in his award-winning 2007 book The World Without Us to envision how rapidly the earth might regain its health if only the human race were to disappear – and the infrastructure we had constructed withered away, thus restoring nature to its pristine condition.
The path that Wiseman (among others) outlined has now been carried to its furthest (nonviolent) extreme by the Voluntary Human Extinction movement, described in a November 25 New York Times profile of its founder, Les Knight, as “a loose consortium of people who believe that the best thing humans can do to help the Earth is to stop having children.” Their official motto is the wish, “may we live long and die out,” otherwise expressed in a slogan that Knight “hangs at various conventions and street fairs: ‘Thank you for not breeding.’” While other putative experts cited in the Times story, such as Stephanie Feldstein, “director of population and sustainability at the Center for Biological Diversity,” share Knight’s concern about the deleterious effects of overpopulation on wildlife populations and natural resource supplies, the Times writes that “it is rare to find anyone who publicly goes as far as Mr. Knight, who never had children and got a vasectomy in 1973 at the age of 25.” Knight opposes “what he calls reproductive fascism, or lack of ‘the freedom not to have children,’” although the source of restriction on that freedom remains conspicuously unspecified. He further judges that “despite our many achievements, humans are a net detriment to the Earth.” “Considering what we did to this planet,” he maintains, “we’re not a good species.”
Despite this thoroughly misanthropic outlook, Knight is described by the Times as a “gentle” fellow – indeed, conservative talk-show host Tucker Carlson, while criticizing him for espousing the “sickest” beliefs, found him to be “one of the cheeriest guests” the show had ever hosted. While the number of Knight’s followers isn’t known, his group is said to have taken off in popularity once he created a website, the text of which “has been translated into some 30 languages” and which “remains a haven to many.” To indicate Knight’s gentle manner, the Times interviewer describes how he paused “to appreciate” the spectacle of “two juicy garden spiders taking in the sun” on their webs. As an adherent of “deep ecology, which challenges assumptions of human dominance and argues that other species are just as significant” as we are, Knight laments that while “people mention music and art and literature and the great things that we have done – it’s funny they don’t ever mention the bad things,” adding, “I don’t think the whales will miss our songs.”
Whether we share Carlson’s judgment that Knight’s beliefs are sick, they are certainly confused. Is the perspective of whales the proper one from which to judge human musical achievements? Are spider webs – regardless of their complexity – comparable in their impressiveness to the greatest architectural achievements of human beings? And since one of the sources cited on Knight’s website is the 19th-century philosopher of pessimism Arthur Schopenhauer, it’s worth asking: can Knight cite a philosopher – a seeker of knowledge about the universe through reliance on reason – among any nonhuman species? Isn’t Knight himself implicitly adopting a supra-human, divine perspective, comparable to that of God when He first gazes on his completed creation – only to find one major flaw in the created world, the existence of human beings (including himself)?
But let us leave the intellectual confusions of the Voluntary Human Extinction movement to another day. What must more urgently concern us are the moral consequences of the anti-natalist movement, which have extended so far as to cause many young adults to question whether they should have children at all, lest they contribute to the earth’s supposed climate crisis, species extinction, etc.
We need not wonder here whether it is desirable for families to include large numbers of children rather than, say, two or three. DeYoung complains, with some justification, that “contemporary American life does not make raising lots of children” as he and his wife have done “easy.” What is in question at the deepest level is how people’s outlook on life changes when it is no longer oriented to having children at all– or is typically focused on having just a single child, who will impose the least possible cost, in time and money, on his parents.
Although human beings are in a sense, as Aristotle maintains, naturally political (that is, we need to live in political communities, and are equipped by nature with the capacity to organize and maintain them) we are not simply political animals, in the sense that our interests entirely harmonize with those of other members of our community, as do those of social animals like bees or ants. After all, no worker bee has ever been known to call for an uprising among his fellows by uttering the slogan “worker bees of the hive unite, we have nothing to lose but our queen!” We need to be socialized by our environment to care for the well-being of our fellows. And the most fundamental way in which this socialization occurs, Aristotle indicates, is through the family, which is grounded in sentiments that are truly natural or innate, in a way that feeling for our fellow citizens, let alone for the human race as a whole, is not.
Readers of Charles Dickens will recall the comic figure of Mrs. Jellyby (from Bleak House), who is so concerned with the well-being of the natives of a far-off land that she has no time to care for her own children. But while today’s anti-natalists, unlike Mrs. Jellyby, may not have children at all, their ostensible global concerns, like hers, may really reflect a kind of self-centeredness, or even self-idolization, of a sort exemplified by Les Knight and his followers – rather than being of any real benefit to other people.
In addition, it is a fundamental fact of human life, and something essential to the well-being and survival of a political community, that having children is the most likely means of enlisting people’s concern in the future of their country, as well as of the world. This is not of course to deny that childless people may become stalwart citizens and human benefactors. It is, however, to maintain that no human activity is as likely as childrearing to extend most people’s concerns both in breadth (to the good of others) and in length (into the future) – instead of losing themselves in the sort of mindless materialism or “consumerism” that offends Knight, or, at the other extreme, in the radically unnatural self-deification that he exemplifies.
The “presentist” attitude that childlessness encourages, and particularly characterizes fashionable adults in countries like Italy, may help explain the reluctance of electorates in most European nations, and even in Taiwan and South Korea (both threatened by powerful enemies) – as well as the societal elites on whom America’s Democratic Party depends for funding as well as votes – to support defense expenditures adequate to meet their countries’ needs, as opposed to social expenditures or lower taxes: as the influential liberal (but childless) twentieth-century economist John Maynard Keynes famously put it, “In the long run, we’re all dead.” That’s not how parents and grandparents typically think." Environmental Nihilism – Save the Earth, Not the People - AMAC - The Association of Mature American Citizens
This item provided by Dr. Paul Elias Alexander contains comments by Governor DeSantis that could set the whole Covid-19 affair on fire. Details follow.
Quote: "BOOM! DeSantis: "They lied about the COVID gene injection mRNA vaccine, they lied! They said if you take it, will not get COVID, that is false & people with multiple boosters are deathly at risk" See the 1min 23 sec Video. https://palexander.substack.com/p/boom-desantis-they-lied-about-the
This action suggests serious voter fraud violations occurred in Arizona. This item provides details.
Quote: "Arizona County Votes Against Certifying Election Results. A county in Arizona is refusing to certify the results of its elections following Democratic statewide candidates winning in the state, which could flip a House seat won by a Republican to a Democratic win, according to the Associated Press.
The Board of Supervisors of Cochise County, Arizona, bordering Mexico and the U.S. state of New Mexico in Arizona’s Southeast, voted to not certify the official tally of votes in the general elections of Nov. 8, which saw Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona reelected to a full term and Democratic. A meeting of the board was held on Monday via Zoom, with the only agenda item being a motion to verify the results. In a voice vote, it received zero votes in favor and two votes against, with the Democratic chair not voting, resulting in an acclaimed failure among the three-member board.
This is hard to believe but if what this Silicon Valley Whistleblower proves credible it could well be true. Here are the details.
Quote: "You Are Being Watched! More Security Cameras Per Capita in the U.S. than in China: Silicon Valley Whistleblower. Americans today seem to be mostly oblivious and unconcerned that they are being watched, listened to, and recorded every day by the the Big Tech Globalists. I published an article on this topic earlier this month, and it is one of the least-read articles I have published this month. For some reason, even though most people seem to be aware that they are being tracked by the technology they use, they apparently do not believe it negatively affects them too much.
But I wonder how the people who were in Washington D.C. on January 6, 2021, and were subsequently arrested and interrogated for simply being in the area where the Trump rally was taking place, simply because they were carrying a cell phone that tracked their location, which was then obtained from companies like Google, feel about the use of technology that spies on them? It didn’t matter if you were there for the Trump rally or not, or if you loved or hated Trump, just being in the location and allowing Big Tech to monitor their location via their cell phone, even if the phone was on airplane mode in some cases, was enough to warrant an arrest and interrogation.
A Peek Inside the FBI’s Unprecedented January 6 Geofence Dragnet
Google provided investigators with location data for more than 5,000 devices as part of the federal investigation into the attack on the US Capitol.
The FBI’s biggest-ever investigation included the biggest-ever haul of phones from controversial geofence warrants, court records show. A filing in the case of one of the January 6 suspects, David Rhine, shows that Google initially identified 5,723 devices as being in or near the US Capitol during the riot. Only around 900 people have so far been charged with offenses relating to the siege.
The filing suggests that dozens of phones that were in airplane mode during the riot, or otherwise out of cell service, were caught up in the trawl. Nor could users erase their digital trails later. In fact, 37 people who attempted to delete their location data following the attacks were singled out by the FBI for greater scrutiny.
Geofence search warrants are intended to locate anyone in a given area using digital services. Because Google’s Location History system is both powerful and widely used, the company is served about 10,000 geofence warrants in the US each year. Location History leverages GPS, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth signals to pinpoint a phone within a few yards. (Full article.)
I wonder how British journalist Thomas Hale feels about technology that spies on him, after he traveled to China and ended up in a COVID-19 quarantine camp against his will for 10 days, not because he tested positive for COVID, but because he was tracked through his cell phone as being close to someone else who tested positive for COVID. (See video)
A lawsuit was recently filed against the Massachusetts Department of Public Health for allegedly working with Google to install “spyware” onto the Android devices of a million state residents without their knowledge during the COVID-19 pandemic. (Source.)
So the technology used in China to confine people to quarantine camps exists here in the U.S. also. In fact, according to a Silicon Valley whistleblower, there are more security cameras per capita here in the U.S., right NOW, than there are in China!
This is most certainly an important issue that everyone needs to be educated about, and so I highly recommend you spend the time to watch this recent interview with Silicon Valley whistleblower Aman Jabbi who was recently interviewed by Maria Zeee.
I used to earn my living from Big Tech, and have been warning people for years that the biggest threat from Big Tech is NOT technology that is supposedly going to replace humans or breed new “transhumans,” but that the biggest threat was from using artificial intelligence (AI) to be able to monitor huge amounts of data to try and track every single person on the face of the planet.
But having been out of the technology field for many years now, even I learned many things from this interview with Aman Jabbi, who has since moved out of Silicon Valley to live in a remote area of Montana.
Aman’s area of expertise is in camera technology, and watching his presentation introduced me to new concepts I was not previously familiar with, such as geofencing, panopticon, talk pedometers, and LED incapacitators. If you are not familiar with these terms, as I wasn’t, this video is must viewing. It was published a week ago and already has over 270,000 views at the time I am writing this.
One of the things Aman discussed was the fact that collecting data on children is a “BIG BUSINESS,” and parents are unwittingly supplying this data to Big Tech by using their products, such as the “Talk Pedometer.”
LENA technology is the industry standard for measuring talk with children, which is a critical factor in early brain development. LENA uses a small wearable device — often referred to as a “talk pedometer” — combined with cloud-based software to deliver detailed feedback that helps adults make proven, sustainable increases in interactive talk with children. (Source.)
This obviously opens up more doors for the State and the Child Welfare system to monitor parents and be able to medically kidnap their children if they are not raising their children according to pre-determined standards, as these parents are using devices connected to the Internet in their own home allowing Big Tech to spy on them.
Aman discusses things like “Prodigy Asset Groups” where investments are made on smart children with huge potentials. But there is even more money to be made on children with physical or special needs, by selling drugs and therapies. Parents who do not comply could lose their children to the State. Another topic Aman covered in his presentation was “LED Capacitators” and “smart light poles.” (See video) You Are Being Watched! More Security Cameras Per Capita in the U.S. than in China: Silicon Valley Whistleblower (healthimpactnews.com)
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment