Tuesday, November 1, 2022

The Selfish Collective

 Much of the debate surrounding Covid has been framed in terms of individualism vs. collectivism

  • Individualists are motivated by self-interest while collectivists put their community first
  • This dichotomy paints the collective voice, or the community, as the prosocial option of two choices
  • The individual threatens the common good because they won't go along with the program everyone else has decided upon
  • There are several immediate problems with this logic
  • Loaded assumptions and false equivalencies
  • Equates the philosophy of collectivism with the idea of prosocial motivation
  • It equates prosocial behavior with conformity to a collective voice
  • emphasis on collective rather than individual action or identity
  • No mention here of internal motivations

When "Common Good" is Not Collective Will

  • Social groups are made up of individuals. Social concern involves negotiation, tolerance of value differences, and the ability to compromise or see nuance.
  • Someone motivated by genuine social concern asks the question: "What are the priorities and goals of all community members, and how can we try to satisfy these priorities in a way that everyone finds acceptable?"

Collective Narcissism and Conformity

  • In social psychology, collective narcissism is the extension of one's ego beyond oneself to a group or collective to which one belongs.
  • The emergent "personality" of the group mirrors the traits of narcissistic individuals
  • A heavy emphasis on binary themes
  • Discouraging free thinking
  • Prioritizing conformity
  • Distrusting or dishonoring differences of opinion
  • Pressure to display loyalty
  • An idealized group self-image

The Hidden Logic of Lockdown

  • The pro-mandate case follows the logic of the selfish collective
  • Restrictions and mandates will "stop the spread" of the virus, thereby saving lives and shielding people from harm it causes
  • How dangerous would the virus have to be in order for the restrictions and mandates to be justified?
  • Is any level of "dangerousness" enough? Or is there a threshold? Can we quantify these thresholds
  • What other "socially beneficial outcomes" are desirable, and from whose perspective? What other social priorities exist for various factions within the collective?

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-selfish-collective/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Vital SCOTUS Case Tests The President’s Absolute Authority To Remove Executive Branch Officials

The Supreme Court is set to hear the case Trump v. Slaughter, which will address whether the President of the United States has the authorit...