The massively corrupt left-wing partisan progressive Democrat socialists in our midst cannot stop leveling charges against anyone who does not agree with them with hate speech filled with their falsetto holier-than-thou rants. But, people are waking up to their fraudulent pesonal attacks since they are exposing their ugly rhetoric for what it is: lies, misdirection, baseless attacks, corruption and criminality. The courts are now recognizing the truth of just who and what they are. This is just one example. This regards a frivolus case lodged against Trump.
One woman–whose accusations against him failed–went on to sue him over supposed defamation.Now, a court has given its verdict. From The Western Journal: A three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York ruled on Tuesday that E. Jean Carroll could not sue Trump personally for any defamatory statements he made about her when he was president…Carroll, an author and former advice columnist, initially sued Trump in November 2019, Reuters reported. E. Jean Carroll made startling accusations against Trump back in June of 2019. Not even the MSM believed Carroll’s claims, for which she provided no evidence. Those claims appeared not to stick–as the story quickly faded from the media.
So, after her first attempt at taking down Trump failed, she sued him for defamation. Sound familiar? A porn actress Stormy Daniels tried the same thing previously. After her attempts at slandering Trump failed, she sued him over comments he made on Twitter. Not only did she lose, but she was also forced to pay Trump hundreds of thousands in legal fees. Carroll must be pretty stupid to try the same thing after it failed for Daniels.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Carroll’s defamation claims. This time, on the grounds that she can’t sue him over statements made while president. The previous lawsuit was thrown out over the First Amendment. But this time, it appears the court is acknowledging Trump’s executive privilege over the matter.
The court essentially said Trump is immune to this lawsuit, because of the Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988. It doesn’t look like Carroll’s personal crusade against Trump is going to fail.
I wonder what the left will do next to attack Trump? Sue him over his choice of ties? Go after his golf swing?" Federal Court Rules on Major Trump Case - In Defamation Suit, They Just Gave Donald a Partial Victory (thepatriotjournal.com)
Here is another example. Quote: "9th Circuit Court Drops the Gavel on California – In 8-3 Decision, They Just Ruled Against Shutting Down Migrant Prisons. For many years now, California has been a leftist stronghold. And its Ninth Circuit Appeals Court has historically sided with Democrats, in a variety of topics ranging from crime to the economy. California has also been proud of its “sanctuary state” position, as they’ve played host to hundreds of thousands of undocumented residents in recent years. However, the state’s high court just made a big decision — and it may come as a surprise to many.
Despite some recent reports that California is struggling on several important fronts, the seem reluctant to change their leadership. Democrats traditionally hold sway, and that fact continues today. They also continue to voice support for illegal immigrants, which is why the state passed a law that tried to close down most detention centers. The problem is that this law apparently circumvents the Supreme Court, which the Ninth Circuit federal court just couldn’t allow. From Breitbart: The Ninth Circuit federal appeals court, one of the most liberal courts in the nation, struck down a California law that sought to close most of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities holding illegal aliens. Sitting en banc, the Ninth Circuit found that California’s AB 32 — passed in 2019 and meant to close effectively all ICE detention facilities across the sanctuary state — violates the Supremacy Clause by flouting federal immigration law.
Initially, the law was struck down by a three-judge panel. At the time, however, this move was erased by the Ninth Circuit so the case could be re-heard by all 11 judges. That didn’t change the outcome, though. In an 8-3 decision, the court cited the “significant fluctuations in the population of noncitizens who are detained, and other challenges unique to California.”
As such, ICE “relies almost exclusively on privately operated detention facilities in the state to maintain flexibility. AB 32 would stop these from running, which could’ve caused serious problems. Beyond that, however, there’s the issue of the Supreme Court law. As the court stated: AB 32 would override the federal government’s decision, pursuant to discretion conferred by Congress, to use private contractors to run its immigration detention facilities. It would give California a “virtual power of review” over ICE’s detention decisions, and allow the “discretion of the federal officers [to] be exercised . . . only if the [state] approves. AB 32 therefore violates the Supremacy Clause.
The decision was celebrated by Republicans and Conservatives across the state, as well as the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI).
IRLI member Dale Wilcox applauded the ruling, saying that AB 32 was “unconstitutional” and that no state should be allowed to interfere with or cancel federal immigration law.
California wasn’t the only state that tried to ban ICE prisons; other deep blue states like New York, Illinois, Washington, and New Jersey attempted to get rid of the detention centers for undocumented individuals. But in the end, such maneuvers run counter to federal law — and even the Ninth Circuit in California can’t ignore it. The border crisis remains in full swing according to various Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and ICE reports, and some southern states have dubbed the mess a full-on “invasion.” 9th Circuit Court Drops the Gavel on California - In 8-3 Decision, They Just Ruled Against Shutting Down Migrant Prisons (thepatriotjournal.com)
It is obvious that both our current DOJ and FBI are corrupt federal bureaucracies. It is also obvious that former FBI personnel are not happy with the current state of affairs of their former employee.
Quote: "30 Former FBI Agents Show Support for Agency Whistleblower. Thirty former FBI agents have sent messages in support of suspended FBI whistleblower Stephen Friend, according to the New York Post. Columnist Miranda Devine said the Post obtained the messages, which came from a retired deputy assistant director, a former head of counterterrorism, and others. Republican senators have accused the FBI leadership of retaliation against Friend, who claimed the agency is creating misleading domestic terrorism crime statistics.
Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Ron Johnson, R-Wis., have sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland on Monday, asserting that bureau leadership wrongly disciplined the FBI agent who raised concerns about cases related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021. The senators included a copy of Friend's whistleblower declaration in their letter. Friend said he was suspended by the FBI for speaking up and refusing to participate in investigations related to the events of Jan. 6. And the messages from the former agents showed additional support for Friend.
"It's time to stop the FBI from being the enforcer of a political party's ideology," says Ernie Tibaldi, a retired agent from San Francisco. "We need to re-establish the FBI as the apolitical and independent law enforcement entity that it always was."
And Terry Turchie, former deputy assistant director of the FBI's Counterterrorism Division, added: "Moral courage, leadership in the face of pressure, and true to the oath of office FBI agents take to defend the United States Constitution and protect America and its citizens. "I am beyond proud to offer him my support in the decisions he had to make." Former SWAT team member, retired special agent Bob Fricke, said: "When I see the FBI using extreme SWAT tactics on elderly and other citizens who pose no physical threat, it makes me sick. It has to be purely political.
"I participated in many searches authorized by legally obtained search warrants … [all] included serious felonies. The only time I recall participating in a pre-dawn raid in which we all wore body armor and needed SWAT team … assistance involved an extremely violent motorcycle gang … "I believe special agent Friend is an American hero. He is a shining example of what I attempt to inculcate in my students, honor above self." 30 Former FBI Agents Show Support for Agency Whistleblower | Newsmax.com
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment