Paul Offit, MD is the Director of the Vaccine Education Center and practices medicine in the Infectious Disease department at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and he also sits on the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC). Check out this 1 minute video where Dr. Offit talks about the new bivalent booster and the "scant evidence" and that the "fix was in:"
Background
- Several months ago, VRBPAC voted to approve a COVID vaccine novel booster formula that combined the mRNA instructions that targeted BA.4 and BA.5 - the two Omicron strains which circulated last spring and early summer.
- There were no human clinical trials conducted on this booster. It was tested on just 8 mice.
Why did Paul Offit vote No on the boosters
- There was no trial to show any clinical benefits at all
- Once you have your initial injection, you're already protected against severe disease so there is no additional benefit to a booster
- The FDA doesn't really want the outside committee members to actually review the scientific data
- They just want them to vote yes so it looks like outside experts reviewed the data
Why is the government advocating for more doses when there is no evidence of a benefit?
- The reason for three or more doses is because the press and the public health officials want you to get it
- This is about compliance with orders, not protecting your health
- In short, the booster was created to give the public the perception that the government is doing something to protect them
Summary
- You can never unvaccinate yourself
No comments:
Post a Comment