Anthony Fauci defends a new grant to the EcoHealth Alliance
- Received tens of millions in research dollars from the federal government and partnered with China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) since 2004
- Former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) defended the grant as necessary
- Controversial because it comes only weeks after the National Institutes of Health terminated a grant to Ecohealth Alliance
The new grant is for "Analyzing the potential for future bat coronavirus emergence in Myanmar, Laos, and Vietnam."
- Dr. Fauci continues to tout the theory that the COVID-19 virus arose naturally in the wild.
- By contrast, Dr. Robert Redfield, a virologist and former director of the Centers for Disease Control, contended that the most likely etiology of this pathology in Wuhan was from a laboratory.
LeDuc signed three agreements to destroy files, materials and equipment, even after the deals had expired
- Those are hardly the only actions yet to receive the attention they deserve.
- After Dr. Redfield cited evidence for a laboratory origin, the CDC director got death threats, but no word of any investigation by the FBI.
Everyone had to agree to the narrative enforced by Dr. Anthony Fauci and other health officials that the COVID-19 virus came from a "wet market" in Wuhan
- In early 2020, Dr. Nancy Messonnier of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) identified the "Wuhan market" as the source of the deadly "new virus," for which, she said, there was no immunity.
Anthony Fauci is a non-practicing medical doctor who first does harm and has no use for informed consent
- His bio shows no advanced degrees in molecular biology or biochemistry but he has headed NIAID since 1984
- He wields executive-level power, but never has to face voters
- The struggle of the people against white coat supremacy is the struggle of memory against forgetting.
No comments:
Post a Comment