Skip to main content

DC Bar Does Democrats’ Dirty Work By Tarring Opponents Right Before Midterms

 In an unprecedented move, the D.C. Bar opened an investigation into a former top Justice Department lawyer for advice he gave former President Donald Trump

  • The timing of the procedures, and the complicity between elected officials and the bar, suggest a concerted attempt to create an October surprise
  • If the investigation of Jeff Clark is indeed a Democrat-fueled disbarment scheme, it could start an escalating war of political retribution
  • It risks irreparably cementing America's partisan divide in the governance of our great country

Even Worse

  • The Jan. 6 Committee's partisan lying about Clark and others is bad enough, but the D.C. Bar's complicity in this political lawfare proves a more significant affront to our constitutional governance - and more destructive to our country.
  • In refusing to dismiss the charge, Clark submitted a detailed motion to dismiss, arguing the DC Bar lacks jurisdiction to punish him for the advice he provided then-President Trump, and that in any event, the alleged charges fail to state a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct because there were no false statements as a matter of law.
  • The DC Bar refused to rule on Clark's motion to toss the charge.

Far-Reaching Consequences

  • The rank partisanship of the D.C. Bar reeks, but the consequences extend much beyond the personal attack on Clark because the charge that Clark violated the Rules of Professional Conduct rests entirely on the advice he provided the then-president.
  • Lawyers working in the executive branch must be free to provide the president with their view of the law, and the bar has no business questioning that guidance because it is the president's sole responsibility to determine how best to execute his Article II duties.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/09/30/dc-bar-does-democrats-dirty-work-by-tarring-opponents-right-before-midterms/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...