Sunday, September 6, 2026

A Decade Long Food Fight Comes to a Head as Joel Salatin Calls for a "Food Emancipation Proclamation"

 By Staff

The following article is based on a speech delivered by Joel Salatin at Hillsdale College titled "A Parallel Food System Already Exists. Are You In It?" In it, Salatin lays out a full indictment of industrial agriculture and makes the case that a decentralized, regenerative food system is not only possible but already running for anyone willing to opt in. He grounds every argument in his own working farm, Polyface Farm in Virginia, and closes with a call for what he names a food emancipation proclamation. The ideas, the figures, and the ten contrasts in this article all come directly from that speech. I have linked the full video below and I strongly encourage everyone to watch it in its entirety. The speech deserves to be heard in Salatin's own voice, and no written summary can do justice to the energy and conviction he brings to it. If you have any interest in food freedom, soil health, or the future of farming, this is one to watch.

Watch the full speech here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onWZTGr6_SA

The most famous pasture based farmer in America says the conventional food system is a sinking aircraft carrier and that a parallel system is already running for anyone willing to opt in. His message has not changed in decades. What has changed is how many people are now listening.

Joel Salatin of Polyface Farm in Virginia has spent his life arguing that industrial agriculture is not more efficient but merely better at hiding its true costs. In a widely circulated speech he lays out ten contrasts between the conventional system and what he calls the lunatic fringe alternative. The speech amounts to a full indictment and a concrete invitation.

Salatin opens with proof from his own farm. When Russia invaded Ukraine, fertilizer prices rose four hundred percent in some cases and global grain shipments faltered. His farm felt nothing. They buy no fertilizer and no foreign grain. Their freezers were full and their basement was stocked with canned produce.

The same pattern held in 2020. Store shelves went bare and farmers euthanized millions of chickens, turkeys, and hogs because mega processing plants could not stay open. His household again had full freezers and a stocked pantry.

His central claim is that decentralization beats centralization every time. A lot of little things out compete one big thing. He asks whether the food system would have convulsed so violently if instead of three hundred mega processing facilities employing five thousand workers each, the nation funneled food through three hundred thousand community scale facilities of twenty to fifty workers.

Salatin's first and sharpest contrast is cheap food versus precious food. America spends the least per capita on food of any nation and the most per capita on health care. The bill was simply moved.

He argues the cheap food model created concentrated feeding operations that became incubators for disease, rode on a sea of cheap energy, and promised pharmaceutical health in place of real health. Sub therapeutic antibiotic use bred superbugs. A new vocabulary entered daily life including campylobacter, listeria, E. coli, salmonella, food allergies, and type two diabetes.

His framing is blunt. These are nature beaten and abused on its knees, pleading enough.

He traces the decline to the nineteenth century doctrine that all life is simply nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Replacing a complex biological community with simple chemicals, he argues, starves the human microbiome.

Salatin is fond of stark figures. He says you must eat three times as much broccoli today to get the same nutrition as in 1940. His own pastured eggs tested at over one thousand micrograms of folic acid against forty eight for conventional supermarket eggs. Grass finished beef has three hundred percent more riboflavin than grain finished. The average morsel of food traveled forty miles from field to fork in 1946 and now travels fifteen hundred miles. The system went from one calorie of energy per calorie of food to fifteen.

His farm moved from one percent organic matter in the soil to more than eight percent over half a century. Every one percent increase holds twenty thousand gallons of water per acre. That is one hundred forty thousand gallons per acre of new water holding capacity on land that was once the rock pile armpit of the community.

The title of the speech turned into a talking point. Salatin says building a pastured poultry operation costs about as much as canceling a Netflix subscription for a couple of months.

The contrast is stark. A young person who wants to grow chickens for Tyson faces a half million dollar building as the first item on the agenda. Salatin's model is a ten by twelve foot floorless box holding seventy five broilers moved daily across pasture. Build one with a few months of saved subscription money. Build another with retained earnings. Over time, more than two hundred of them, debt free.

He ties this to a succession crisis. The average American farmer is now sixty years old. In the next fifteen years, half of all agricultural equity will change hands. No civilization has seen that big a change in ownership in peacetime.

The speech's sharpest moment comes when Salatin cites a Government Accounting Office study on foodborne illness that identified four culprits. Centralized production, centralized processing, long distance transportation, and sub therapeutic use of antibiotics.

He calls it one of the only times a government study got it right. Then he asks why no one in power dared to ask what the opposite would be. The opposite of centralized production is lots of viable small farms. The opposite of centralized processing is neighborhood canneries. The opposite of long distance transportation is local. The opposite of drugging animals is happy pigs.

The answer, he says, is that the solution would invert the power, position, prestige, and profits of the entire food and farm industry.

Salatin does not shy away from the enforcement side. He points to Amish farmer Amos Miller in Pennsylvania and the Rawesome Foods buying club in California, where government agents showed up to confiscate what he calls integrity food. He notes that on his own farm they cannot legally mill their own trees into lumber and sell a chair because it is classified as manufacturing, which is illegal in an agricultural zone.

He supports what he calls the National Rogue Food Conference movement, which promotes circumvention rather than compliance.

His proposed remedy is a food emancipation proclamation guaranteeing every American the right to purchase the food of their choice from the source of their choice. His line is that when the government gets between his spoon and his throat, he calls that an invasion of privacy. If we demand government out of our bedrooms and out of our wombs, he argues, it is time to get government out of our stomachs.

The speech is built on ten juxtapositions between the industrial system and his parallel alternative. Cheap food versus precious food. Quantity versus quality. Segregated versus integrated. Centralized versus decentralized. Mechanical versus biological. Opaque versus transparent. Chemical versus carbon. Sickness versus health. Exploitive versus nurturing. Tyranny versus liberty.

Every one, he argues, is the same diagnosis from a different angle. The industrial system optimized for the wrong target and is now fragile, depleted, and dying with its farmers.

Salatin is not asking for permission or reform. He says the parallel system is already built and already weathered the shocks the big system could not. It scales by duplication rather than centralization and by participation rather than permission.

His closing challenge is simple. Look through your plate at dinner and ask what farms, what foodscape, and what nutritional commitment sit on the other side. Make your menu agree with what you know and believe in your mind.

The only question in the title remains the one he wants answered. Are you in it.

Sources:

The speech the article is based on

A Parallel Food System Already Exists. Are You In It? by Joel Salatin at Hillsdale College

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onWZTGr6_SA

Related Background Sources

These are for readers who want to go deeper on Salatin and the ideas in the speech. Note that I am listing them from context and general knowledge, not from direct verification of each URL, so double check any link before publishing.

Joel Salatin's farm

Polyface Farm official site: https://www.polyfacefarms.com

Salatin's books referenced in the speech

You Can Farm, the book he jokes about in the speech: https://www.polyfacefarms.com/you-can-farm

The Sheer Ecstasy of Being a Lunatic Farmer: https://www.polyfacefarms.com/the-sheer-ecstasy-of-being-a-lunatic-farmer

Folks, This Ain't Normal: https://www.polyfacefarms.com/folks-this-aint-normal

Sir Albert Howard's book quoted in the speech

An Agricultural Testament (1943): https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.271729

Wendell Berry, cited in the speech for the cost of divorce essay

Wendell Berry's essays on agriculture and the economy: https://www.berrycenter.org

Michael Pollan's book that brought Salatin to national attention

The Omnivore's Dilemma: https://michaelpollan.com/books/the-omnivores-dilemma/

The documentary featuring Salatin

Food, Inc.: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1286537/


Saturday, September 5, 2026

The Machine That Will Retire Your Refrigerator

  By Staff Writer

Two solid state cooling breakthroughs in 2026 mean the century long reign of the compressor fridge is coming to an end.

Your refrigerator uses the same basic technology it did in the 1920s. A compressor pushing refrigerant gas through copper coils. We added lights, ice makers and Wi-Fi. We never changed how it actually works.

That is about to change.

In December 2025, researchers from Japan’s National Institute for Material Science and Germany’s Technical University of Darmstadt solved a problem that had stumped scientists for decades.

The idea is simple. Certain materials heat up when you apply a magnetic field and cool down when you remove it. Cycle a magnet on and off and you have a heat pump with no compressor, no refrigerant gases and almost no moving parts.

The catch was always this, materials that cooled powerfully destroyed themselves quickly through internal friction called hysteresis. Materials that lasted were too weak to be useful. You could never have both.

The team cracked it by tweaking the atomic bonds in a gadolinium germanium compound. They swapped some germanium atoms for tin, which cushioned the internal structure during magnetic cycling. The result was a material that stayed powerful and durable at the same time, doubling its cooling performance while eliminating degradation.

Published in Advanced Materials, the work involved institutions across Japan and Germany. This was not a garage experiment. It was state funded, multi institutional and immediately applicable to industrial gas cooling.

In January 2026, a team at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology published in Nature something no solid state cooling device had ever achieved. They crossed the freezing line.

Their approach used shape memory alloys, metals that heat up when compressed and cool down when released. No refrigerants, no compressor. The problem had always been that these alloys stopped working properly near freezing temperatures.

Professor Sun Qingping’s team engineered a nickel titanium alloy with 51.2 percent nickel that stayed functional down to negative 21°C. They machined the alloy into thin walled tubes, arranged them in a series of regenerator units and used a linear actuator to apply compression.

The device reached negative 12°C in lab testing and successfully froze water into ice outdoors on a warm day. The full cycle takes one second. Its coefficient of performance hit 3.4 under ideal conditions, competitive with conventional systems.

TU Darmstadt has a spin off called MAGNOTHERM Solutions GmbH. Their cooling platform, called ECLIPSE, has already been integrated into a supermarket freezer in partnership with the REWE Group, one of Germany’s largest grocery chains. It runs 15 percent more efficiently than conventional freezers.

Professor Sun predicts a market ready elastocaloric product within two to three years. The remaining hurdles are manufacturing costs and actuator efficiency, both under active development.

When solid state cooling reaches your kitchen, the implications are enormous:

Food waste collapses. Roughly a billion tons of annual food waste becomes edible food. Produce lasts weeks or months instead of days.

Farmers gain power. Without the pressure to sell immediately before spoilage, growers can name their price.

Supply chains transform. Fish crosses oceans without freezing. Produce moves between hemispheres without the fragile cold chain.

The compressor fridge becomes a museum piece. Sitting next to the ice box it replaced a century ago.

You are not watching a concept video. The machine that retires your refrigerator already exists, already runs and is already cooling a supermarket somewhere in Germany. The countdown has started.

Sources:

Japan NIMS magnetic refrigeration breakthrough 2026 gadolinium germanium

Novel Materials Design Approach Achieves a Giant ... nims.go.jp

Control of Covalent Bond Enables Efficient Magnetic Cooling doi.org

The future of eco-friendly cooling: Enhancing efficiency and ... phys.org

Control of Covalent Bond Enables Efficient Magnetic Cooling - MDR: NIMS Materials Data Repository mdr.nims.go.jp

The Future of Eco-Friendly Cooling – TU Darmstadt tu-darmstadt.de

Technical University Darmstadt magnetic refrigeration solid state 2026

Technology transfer for sustainable cooling – Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology – TU Darmstadt etit.tu-darmstadt.de

The Future of Eco-Friendly Cooling tu-darmstadt.de

Engineered atomic bonds help achieving improved... | 2026/02/19 iifiir.orgMagnetic Materials – Materials Science – TU Darmstadt mawi.tu-darmstadt.de

Darmstadt. Enhancing AMR Performance with Optimized PM Assembly – ECMI ecmiindmath.org

Hong Kong shape memory alloy cooling subzero elastocaloric 2026

HKUST Develops World’s First Sub-Zero Celsius Elastocaloric Green Freezer, Reshaping Freezing Industry with its Zero Emissions | HKUST hkust.edu.hk

Sub-zero Celsius elastocaloric cooling via low-transition-temperature alloys - The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Research Portal researchportal.hkust.edu.hk

Solid-State Elastocaloric Cooling Hits Sub-Zero Mark spectrum.ieee.org

HKUST Engineering Develops World’s First Sub-Zero Celsius Elastocaloric Green Freezer | HKUST School of Engineering seng.hkust.edu.hk

Sub-zero Celsius elastocaloric cooling via low-transition- ... scholars.cityu.edu.hk

NYC Built A Government-Backed Staffing Pipeline For CAIR’s New York Chapter

New York City has utilized AmeriCorps funding to support the New York chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which is controversial due to its alleged connections to radical organizations. Documents reveal that full-time AmeriCorps members have played a significant role in building CAIR-NY’s operations, despite warnings and restrictions from federal authorities.

Use of AmeriCorps: The NYC Civic Corps program has been employed to staff CAIR-NY. A full-time member managed volunteers, data, marketing, and outreach initiatives, particularly focusing on school and mosque engagement.

Praise from NYC Service: The city agency commended this member for organizing substantial community outreach and promoting initiatives against Islamophobia.

Historical Context: CAIR was named as a co-conspirator in a federal case against the Holy Land Foundation, which was linked to Hamas. Despite this, the NYC Civic Corps continues to support CAIR-NY.

FBI Restrictions: The FBI has limited its outreach to CAIR due to links between CAIR leaders and Hamas. These restrictions also apply to local chapters, including CAIR-NY, yet the city has sustained a working relationship with the organization.

State Actions: In a further step, Texas labeled CAIR a "Foreign Terrorist Organization" under state law, but this designation does not carry federal weight.

Civic Corps Benefits: Members of the NYC Civic Corps are provided various benefits, including a stipend of $24,500, an education award, healthcare, and professional training opportunities.

Operational Support: In addition to administrative support, Civic Corps members significantly expanded CAIR-NY’s volunteer base, outperforming the organization's existing team size.

Despite the controversial background of CAIR, New York City continues to invest taxpayer resources in supporting its New York chapter through AmeriCorps. This decision has sparked debate about the city’s priorities and its implications for national service initiatives involving organizations perceived as radical. 

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/exclusive-nyc-built-a-government?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=213143933&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Labor Day Jobs Report Shows Trumpnomics Is Working

 The August jobs report shows that the economy is performing strongly, particularly in manufacturing, suggesting that economic policies under Donald Trump's administration are producing positive results.

Job Growth: Nonfarm payrolls increased by 162,000 in August, significantly exceeding expectations, with total job gains in June and July revised upward by 55,000.

Unemployment Rate: The unemployment rate remains low at 4.1%, with a rise in labor-force participation to 61.6%.

Manufacturing: Manufacturing jobs grew by 16,000 in August, mainly in durable goods, indicating a resurgence in the sector. There is a total increase of 58,000 manufacturing jobs this year.

Construction: Employment in construction rose by 22,000, showing significant growth since Trump took office, contributing to future manufacturing and productivity increases.

Wages: Average hourly earnings increased by 0.3% in August and by 3.1% over the year, with notable wage growth in manufacturing and construction.

Economic Context: The report counters narratives of recession and stagflation, emphasizing stable job creation and industrial recovery driven by tariffs, tax cuts, and deregulation.

Overall, the August jobs report signals a resilient economy, showcasing job growth across several sectors and reinforcing the effectiveness of Trump's economic policies. It indicates a shift towards rebuilding American manufacturing and construction, advocating for cautious economic management, particularly by the Federal Reserve. 

https://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2026/09/04/labor_day_jobs_report_shows_trumpnomics_is_working_1204399.html

In China You Go to Prison for ‘Slandering’ History’s Greatest Killer

Chinese artist Gao Zhen is facing a three-year prison sentence for his artistic critiques of Mao Zedong, the controversial former leader of China. This case highlights the current stringent control over criticism in China, particularly regarding its historical figures.

1. Background on Mao Zedong:

Mao Zedong, known as the “Great Helmsman,” was the founder of the People's Republic of China and ruled from 1949 until his death in 1976.

Although the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) once allowed some criticism of Mao, this leniency has since diminished, and Mao's legacy is now firmly defended by the government.

2. Gao Zhen’s Conviction:

Gao Zhen, a 70-year-old artist and permanent U.S. resident, was detained while visiting China in 2024. He was accused of "slandering China’s heroes and martyrs," specifically Mao, through his artwork.

His conviction, which has resulted in a three-year prison sentence, reflects the severe crackdown on artistic expression and historical critique in China.

3. Gao’s Artistic Work:

Gao Zhen created provocative sculptures depicting Mao in a critical light, including a caricature with exaggerated features and others addressing the suffering caused during Mao's leadership.

His past works also addressed significant historical events such as the Cultural Revolution and the Tiananmen Square Massacre.

4. Historical Context of Totalitarian Regimes:

Many brutal leaders worldwide, like Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin, have been condemned by later generations, while Mao remains a celebrated figure in Chinese society despite the many atrocities committed during his regime.

The CCP has instituted laws to protect the reputations of historical figures, which has led to the prosecution of individuals for past speech or art deemed disrespectful.

5. Current Political Climate:

Under Xi Jinping's leadership, China has seen a regression in political freedom and artistic expression, as criticism of the government and its historical figures is increasingly punished.

Gao Zhen's case demonstrates the harsh reality faced by individuals who attempt to engage in open discussions about China’s past.

The sentencing of Gao Zhen serves as a stark reminder of the tightening grip of the CCP over artistic expression and historical discourse in China. The government’s measures to protect the legacy of Mao Zedong illustrate its ongoing effort to control the narrative surrounding its history and suppress dissent. Until the Chinese people can freely confront and discuss their past, including the legacy of Mao, they will remain in a state of intellectual and political bondage. 

https://spectator.org/in-china-you-go-to-prison-for-slandering-historys-greatest-killer/ 

American Journalist Sentenced to Prison After Pleading Guilty to Working as an Agent of the Chinese Government

 Thomas Weir Pauken II, a 51-year-old American journalist, was sentenced to two years in federal prison for acting as an unregistered agent of the Chinese government. His actions raised significant concerns about foreign intelligence operations targeting Americans.

Pauken worked under the direction of a Chinese contact, referred to as "Cathy," from at least 2019 until his arrest in February 2026.

He was involved in assignments that included meeting potential intelligence contacts in the U.S., providing communication devices, and gathering reports.

Pauken reportedly received over $100,000 for his work and had attempted to connect his Chinese handler with an individual seeking a government position in the Trump administration.

He provided this individual with a SIM card and offered money in exchange for weekly reports intended for China, believing information could reach Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Although Pauken's attorney noted he did not provide classified information, prosecutors deemed his actions a serious national security threat, emphasizing betrayal for financial gain.

Pauken claimed he thought he was fostering better U.S.-China relations but acknowledged he could have caused significant harm.

The judge imposed a prison sentence to deter similar actions in the future, highlighting the ongoing threat of foreign interference.

The case illustrates the risks posed by foreign influence and the serious consequences of betraying national security interests, reinforcing the importance of vigilance against foreign operations in sensitive circles. 

https://www.westernjournal.com/american-journalist-sentenced-prison-pleading-guilty-working-agent-chinese-government/

Left-Wing Outlet Says It's a 'Racist Conspiracy Theory' to Talk About Immigrants Replacing American Voters

 Mediaite, a media outlet owned by Dan Abrams, has been criticized for its recent coverage of demographic changes in America, particularly in relation to immigration and voter registration. This summary addresses the media's portrayal of these discussions as racist conspiracy theories and discusses the implications of such framing.

Mediaite’s critique of a conversation between Newsmax host Rob Finnerty and GOP Rep. James Comer labeled their discussion as promoting a “racist conspiracy theory” related to the Great Replacement Theory.

In their conversation, Comer suggested that Democrats support increased immigration to gain new voters, a viewpoint Finnerty labeled as the Great Replacement Theory.

Mediaite did not present this discussion neutrally; instead, it asserted that discussing demographic change is inherently racist, distancing itself from presenting factual statistics on immigration.

Statistics from Pew Research indicate significant changes in the U.S. demographic landscape since 1970, such as a rise in foreign-born residents from 4.7% to 14.8% and a decrease in the non-Hispanic white population from 83.5% to 56.3%.

The text argues that immigration’s impact on the electorate is a legitimate discussion, one that politicians have openly engaged in, suggesting that Mediaite’s accusations silence critical conversations.

The article claims that dismissing an argument as a “racist conspiracy theory” obstructs debate without addressing underlying facts regarding immigration and its electoral implications.

It argues that individuals should be allowed to engage in discussions about demographic changes without being labeled as racist by media outlets.

The transformation of America's demographics and the political consequences of immigration are real issues that should be discussed openly. Labeling such discussions as racist does not erase the ongoing changes; rather, it highlights a reluctance in some media to engage in meaningful debate. Americans are encouraged to analyze the facts and form their own conclusions about these important topics. 

https://www.westernjournal.com/left-wing-outlet-says-racist-conspiracy-theory-talk-immigrants-replacing-american-voters/

Ohio State pays $2.1M settlement as it admits researcher had ‘inappropriate foreign affiliations’ to China

 Ohio State University (OSU) has agreed to pay $2.1 million to settle allegations from the federal government regarding undisclosed foreign affiliations. The claims involve a former researcher who did not properly disclose his ties to China while receiving taxpayer-funded research grants.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) alleged that OSU failed to inform federal agencies, specifically NASA and the National Science Foundation (NSF), about foreign affiliations of its researchers from 2012 to 2023.

The main concern centered around C.K. Shum, a former earth science professor, who was associated with China's Thousand Talents Program, which aims to attract expertise and technology from abroad.

OSU stated it discovered Shum's affiliations, investigated them, and self-reported to the respective federal authorities. Shum is no longer with the university.

Following awareness of Shum’s connections in 2019, OSU unilaterally implemented actions, such as halting spending on specific federal grants and initiating disciplinary measures against Shum.

The university argued its commitment to national security and research integrity, citing established compliance measures and training for researchers.

It was revealed that other employees of OSU had similar affiliations with Chinese entities, which were not disclosed in grant applications as required.

The DOJ emphasized the importance of full disclosure from universities that rely on federal support for scientific research to maintain research security.

Ohio State University has taken steps to resolve significant allegations regarding non-disclosure of foreign affiliations by paying a $2.1 million settlement. This case highlights the broader expectations of transparency required from American universities concerning foreign funding in federally supported research. 

https://nypost.com/2026/09/05/us-news/ohio-state-university-pays-2-1m-settlement-after-researcher-ck-shum-china-ties/

From Maps to Ballots: All Roads Lead to the Supreme Court

 Recent legal developments in Missouri concerning congressional redistricting and mail-in ballot regulations highlight significant challenges ahead of the elections. The outcomes of these disputes could shape electoral processes and voter confusion.

1. Missouri Supreme Court Ruling:

On September 3, 2026, the Missouri Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the GOP could not implement a new congressional map allowing for a potentially advantageous seat change until a ballot initiative could be voted on in November.

This ruling is unprecedented as it marks the first time a court has overturned a congressional map following primaries and before a general election.

2. Implications of the Ruling:

The decision prevents the Republicans from advancing a map that would eliminate a Democratic seat and strengthen their majority from 6-2 to 7-1.

Challenging the legality of holding primaries under one congressional map and conducting a general election under another raises questions about electoral stability and voter clarity.

3. Federal Court Standards:

Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Purcell principle, which discourages altering election rules close to an election to avoid voter confusion, may guide the Supreme Court's response.

Previous cases suggest that the Supreme Court is wary of changes that could disrupt the electoral process just before elections.

4. Ongoing Postal Service Dispute:

Meanwhile, another legal issue revolves around the Trump administration's new USPS rule regarding mail-in ballots. This rule stipulates that ballots should be withheld from states lacking voter verification lists.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani had issued an injunction against this rule, which the Supreme Court previously lifted as premature.

With the rule now finalized, Talwani issued a temporary restraining order, prompting the DOJ to file an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court for intervention.

5. Timing and Urgency:

Decisions in both cases must be made quickly; early voting in some states begins mid-September, and ballot printing in Missouri is due by September 8.

The Supreme Court will need to act promptly to resolve these disputes as the election timeline approaches.

The Missouri Supreme Court's ruling against the GOP's new congressional map and the ongoing battle over mail-in ballot regulations underscore the complexity of electoral law and the potential for significant changes in upcoming elections. The U.S. Supreme Court's responses will be critical in determining the legal landscape and practical execution of voting procedures in the near future. 

https://www.libertynation.com/from-maps-to-ballots-all-roads-lead-to-the-supreme-court1/

Obama 'Team of Geniuses' Literally Knows Nothing

 The commentary regarding former President Barack Obama's team and their perceived intelligence, along with a recent incident involving the "Pod Save America" podcast hosts.

Barack Obama's aides were once celebrated as extremely intelligent, referred to as a "team of geniuses" by media figures.

The hosts of "Pod Save America," Jon Favreau and Tommy Vietor, mocked politician J.D. Vance for misunderstanding "blood libel" but later realized they did not fully understand the term themselves.

Favreau needed to look up the definition, highlighting that even those considered elite aren't always well-informed.

Hunter Biden criticized the "Pod Bros," highlighting their disconnect from real issues affecting black voters in South Carolina compared to Obama.

Commentary also touches on topics including antisemitism, recent lawsuits, and protests at academic institutions.

The article reflects on the hubris of those in elite positions and the often superficial nature of their expertise, recalling Hunter Biden's remarks to emphasize their disconnect from the communities they represent. 

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/alert-obama-team-of-geniuses-literally-knows-nothing/

States challenging federal data access shared similar voter info with nonprofit

 A recent investigation by the Department of Homeland Security revealed that several Democratic-led states have been sharing sensitive driver’s license information with a nonprofit organization, raising privacy concerns. These states have also been resistant to providing similar data to the federal government.

States Sharing Data: States such as Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, and Pennsylvania, which are challenging efforts by the Trump administration to access voter and driver records for privacy reasons, have been sharing these records with a nonprofit called the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC).

Federal Lawsuits: The Justice Department has filed numerous lawsuits against various states to gain access to unredacted voter rolls. Four states filed lawsuits in September 2025 after refusing to comply with federal demands.

HS Investigation Findings: Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin indicated that ERIC may have violated the Driver's Privacy Protection Act by improperly disclosing sensitive information to contractors. ERIC has connections to the nonprofit Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR), co-founded by David Becker, which is funded by the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.

Reactions from State Officials: Officials from Michigan and Minnesota have expressed concerns over the federal government’s failure to protect residents' private data and have been vocal about their stance against sharing sensitive information.

Existing Grants: Michigan received a grant from CEIR to improve election processes but also has had significant privacy concerns regarding the data shared with ERIC and CEIR.

Legal Developments: Federal judges in three states dismissed the Justice Department's lawsuits, labeling the demands as "unprecedented and illegal."

The actions of these Democratic-led states in sharing sensitive personal data with a nonprofit while resisting federal demands illustrates the complex interplay between state privacy laws and federal data access policies. The ongoing investigation highlights potential violations of privacy laws, and the situation continues to evolve with legal challenges ahead. 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/states-challenging-federal-data-access-shared-similar-voter-info?utm_source=justthenews.com&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

Democrat Senate Faces Party Revolt After Jaw-Dropping Texts Emerge

 Senator John Fetterman is experiencing significant backlash from fellow Pennsylvania Democrats due to leaked text messages and recent reports highlighting his lack of engagement in his senatorial duties.

1. Fetterman is criticized for skipping meetings with constituents and events, leading to harsh comments from party members.

2. Representative Chris Deluzio condemned Fetterman's behavior, calling it "pathetic," and stated that he is unfit for office, indicating potential changes in 2028.

3. Representative Brendan Boyle labeled Fetterman a "disgrace," emphasizing that Pennsylvania deserves better leadership.

4. Leaked texts reveal Fetterman’s dismissive attitude towards requests for meetings, including one with Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia regarding Medicaid issues, where he doubted their intentions.

5. Criticism also arose over Fetterman's reluctance to attend a funeral for three police officers, reflecting broader frustrations within the Democratic Party in Pennsylvania.

6. Relations between Fetterman and other Democrats have soured, with members openly calling for a new candidate in the upcoming 2028 election.

7. Fetterman, initially a progressive ally of Bernie Sanders, has diverged from party lines on several issues and has supported some Republican nominees, causing further concern among fellow Democrats.

The growing discontent among Pennsylvania Democrats indicates deep divisions within the party regarding Fetterman's performance as a senator, raising questions about his political future ahead of the 2028 election. 

https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/new-democrat-senate-faces-party-revolt-after-jaw-dropping-texts-emerge-trin/

Trump DOJ Charges FIVE for Illegal Voting in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Wisconsin — Including Two Illegal Aliens from Mexico in Key Swing States

 The Trump Justice Department announced charges against five individuals for allegedly committing illegal voting and fraudulent registration in several states during the 2022 and 2024 elections. These charges challenge claims that non-citizen voting is a myth.

1. Charged Individuals:

Pennsylvania:

Thomas Holtzman and Marisol Guzman from Carlisle were indicted. Guzman is accused of voting while being an alien, while Holtzman faces charges for aiding her.

Katya Rodriguez, a Mexican national residing in Harrisburg, is also charged with voting illegally as an alien.

New Jersey:

Mercedes Alexandra Cardoso from Union County was charged for registering and voting as a non-citizen.

Wisconsin:

Jesus Javier Jurado Garcia, an illegal alien from Mexico, is charged with voting in the 2022 election despite knowing he was not a U.S. citizen.

2. Potential Penalties:

If convicted, the defendants could face various sentences, including significant prison time and fines, depending on the charges.

3. Investigation and Prosecution:

The cases have been investigated by law enforcement agencies, including Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and the FBI, and are being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys.

4. Broader Context:

These prosecutions are part of a larger initiative by the Trump administration to ensure the integrity of elections by maintaining accurate voter rolls.

Reports have surfaced indicating that there are instances of non-citizens on voter rolls, contradicting claims by some political figures and media.

5. Public Sentiment:

The announcement of these charges has reignited the debate about election integrity, as those advocating for strict voter registration processes had previously been dismissed.

6. Legal Standing:

All defendants maintain their right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty in court.

The charges brought against these five individuals highlight ongoing concerns about election integrity and the enforcement of laws regarding voter registration and eligibility in the U.S. These cases may influence public opinion and policy regarding voting rights and citizenship verification in future elections. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/trump-doj-charges-five-illegal-voting-pennsylvania-new/

Illegal Alien Charged in $1.3 Billion Medicare Fraud Money Laundering Scheme

 A federal grand jury in Massachusetts has indicted Erekle Gugava, a 33-year-old illegal alien, for involvement in a massive healthcare fraud scheme totaling $1.3 billion. The case highlights the role of money laundering in facilitating large-scale fraud against Medicare and other health insurers.

Charges and Allegations: Erekle Gugava is charged with conspiracy to launder money, linked to the largest healthcare fraud case prosecuted by the Department of Justice (DOJ). He allegedly laundered funds for a criminal organization operating mainly out of Russia.

Healthcare Fraud Details: Gugava owned a company called ND Medical Solutions LLC. Within a span of five months (February to July 2025), the company submitted fraudulent claims worth $1.3 billion to Medicare and private insurers. It received approximately $6.5 million from these claims.

Method of Operation: Gugava purportedly facilitated the transfer of funds through bank accounts he opened, making him responsible for directing money from fraudulent claims to international bank accounts benefiting the organization behind the fraud.

Exploitation of Victims: The fraudulent claims were supported by stolen identities of citizens, including vulnerable groups such as the elderly and disabled, who reported receiving benefits for medical equipment and services they never received.

Legal Consequences: If convicted, Gugava faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. The indictment is part of the DOJ’s broader effort to combat fraud in federal benefit programs, led by the National Fraud Enforcement Division.

The indictment of Erekle Gugava illustrates the serious nature of healthcare fraud in the U.S. and the DOJ's commitment to prosecuting those who enable such schemes. The case reflects efforts to protect taxpayer resources and hold accountable individuals who participate in fraud networks. Further investigations are ongoing involving several federal agencies. 

https://townhall.com/news/scott-mcclallen/2026/09/04/illegal-alien-charged-in-13-billion-medicare-fraud-money-laundering-scheme-n2682523

Tyranny by Technicality: The Supreme Court Will Not Save Our Republic

 John and Nisha Whitehead's article discusses the ineffective role of the U.S. Supreme Court in protecting citizens' rights against government overreach and emphasizes the challenges faced in achieving justice within the current judicial system.

Warning of the Supreme Court's Role: The authors argue that for years, it has been clear the Supreme Court cannot be relied upon to protect citizens from the expanding police state in America. The situation is becoming more complex, with courts prioritizing order over freedom.

Example of Overreach: The ongoing dispute regarding President Trump’s $400 million White House ballroom renovation illustrates governmental overreach. Courts found issues with the project, but construction continued while legal battles played out. Ultimately, the Supreme Court allowed the project to move forward, focusing on legal technicalities rather than constitutional authority.

Procedural Hurdles: The authors express concern that constitutional rights are rendered meaningless if courts impose rigorous requirements like establishing legal standing to sue or proving direct harm before any constitutional issues can be addressed. Such limitations can shield government actions from judicial review.

Collapse of Government Balance: The article highlights a breakdown in the constitutional checks and balances system designed to prevent one branch of government from becoming too powerful. If Congress fails to act and courts are limited to procedural issues, rights may be violated before any corrective action can occur.

Governance Tactics: The authors claim that the government uses tactics of delay and deflection to undermine the rule of law, a method that President Trump has notably adopted. This approach limits the effectiveness of judicial remedies to address abuses after the fact.

The Ineffectiveness of Delayed Justice: While courts may eventually rule on constitutional grounds, the reality is that decisions made too late cannot undo the damage already done. Violations of rights such as wrongful imprisonment or unlawful searches result in harm that cannot be reversed.

Courts as Order rather than Justice: The authors contend that various levels of the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, act more as enforcers of governmental authority rather than defenders of individual rights. This trend threatens genuine constitutional governance.

The Role of Congress: The article critiques Congress for its failure to hold the executive branch accountable, reflecting an abdication of responsibility.

Call for Active Citizenship: The authors urge individuals not to rely solely on government institutions for protection of freedoms but to actively challenge governmental overreach. They emphasize the importance of demanding accountability and maintaining constitutional rights, even against familiar political figures.

The article underscores the importance of an engaged citizenry in defending freedom against government excesses, as reliance on the Supreme Court and Congress alone is insufficient. The authors posit that it's ultimately up to "We the People" to reclaim control over constitutional rights and challenge the growth of tyranny by technicality. 

https://thenewamerican.com/opinion/tyranny-by-technicality-the-supreme-court-will-not-save-our-republic/

200-Strong Pro-Mamdani ‘Influencer Network’ Receives ‘Compensation’ from Taxpayers to Push Socialist Agenda Online

 A report reveals that New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani's administration has established a taxpayer-funded network of around 200 influencers to promote socialist messages online. This initiative raises questions about the use of public funds and the relationship between the government and these online creators.

Influencer Network Development: The network, which began during Mamdani's 2025 mayoral campaign as "Creators4Zohran," has transitioned into an official government communications channel post-election.

Content Provision: City Hall provides these influencers with announcements, suggested messaging, and videos to promote on their platforms. They operate largely through a private Signal group called "NYC Creators Announcements."

Oversight and Salaries: The initiative is managed by City Hall’s Director of New Media, Emilia Rowland, with an annual salary of $175,000, while City Communications Director Anna Bhar earns $260,000.

Taxpayer Funding: While the administration claims that influencers are not paid for general promotional work, some have received taxpayer-funded compensation for specific campaigns managed by city agencies.

Past Spending: Previous administrations have also utilized influencer marketing for public campaigns, with costs ranging from $5,000 to $20,000. There are also reports of current spending over $100,000 linked to social media campaigns from the Department of Social Services.

Transparency Issues: Concerns have emerged regarding which influencers receive taxpayer money and how much. Watchdogs demand transparency to distinguish between independent promotion and those with financial ties to the city.

Use of Signal: The use of Signal, an encrypted messaging app, raises additional scrutiny regarding record-keeping and public access to communications about official business. City officials claim they intend to comply with public record laws.

The creation of a pro-Mamdani influencer network funded by taxpayers reflects a close-knit relationship between online creators and City Hall. While the mayor’s office maintains that it is not directly compensating influencers for favorable coverage, the blurred lines between government communications and influencer participation, coupled with public funding, warrant further investigation and transparency.

https://slaynews.com/200-strong-pro-mamdani-influencer-network-receives-compensation-taxpayers-push-socialist-agenda-online/ 

Zuckerberg's 2020 Election Activities Back in the Spotlight — the AG Has Been Notified

 Recently, Mark Zuckerberg has come under scrutiny due to new disclosures from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). These disclosures reveal potential violations of federal privacy laws linked to the sharing of sensitive data by election activist groups he funded, particularly the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR).

1. Data Sharing Concerns: States allegedly shared sensitive motor-vehicle data with CEIR as part of a voter outreach initiative for the 2020 election, potentially violating the Driver's Privacy Protection Act.

2. Attorney General's Review: DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin has requested a review from Attorney General Todd Blanche regarding these potential violations, previously brought before the Department of Justice (DOJ).

3. ERIC's Role: The Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) collects voter-registration and motor-vehicle data to identify eligible but unregistered voters. However, DHS claims that ERIC shared sensitive information with CEIR, which received over $70 million for election-related activities.

4. Data Handling Issues: Concerns were raised about how data related to citizenship is managed, particularly since states were prohibited from sharing information on noncitizens, despite it being crucial to prevent unauthorized voting.

5. Political Implications: Critics argue that the funding and data sharing in 2020 favored partisan election efforts, while CEIR defends its actions as nonpartisan voter education.

The situation raises significant legal questions regarding data privacy and the extent of participation by states in the data-sharing practices involving CEIR and ERIC. The DOJ is now tasked with determining if federal privacy laws were breached and the number of states involved in these activities. 

https://redstate.com/kyle-becker/2026/09/04/zuckerbergs-2020-election-activities-back-in-the-spotlight-the-ag-has-been-notified-n2206534

We Spend a Lot More on Welfare Than Bombs. And That's a Problem.

 The perceived U.S. government spending on defense with actual allocations for welfare. New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani's remarks emphasize a viewpoint that military expenditure overshadows the need for societal support. This summary will highlight the key points related to U.S. welfare and military spending.

Military vs. Welfare Spending: Contrary to Mayor Mamdani's statements, the U.S. spends far more on welfare programs than on military actions. The federal budget allocates about 13% to national defense, which is considerably less than costs associated with Social Security and Medicare.

Welfare Funding: The federal government expends approximately $1.3 trillion annually on welfare and anti-poverty programs, surpassing some entire countries' national budgets. With around 80 individual federal programs aiding the poor, over 36 million Americans receive food stamps.

State and City Support: In New York City, welfare cash assistance dramatically increased, with $2.71 billion distributed in 2025. Social programs in New York City accounted for over $14.63 billion, which is more than spent on police.

Comparison with Military Costs: Spending on munitions averages around $30 billion per year but may rise significantly due to special circumstances like conflicts. In comparison, Medicaid costs much more, at $919 billion in one year.

Public Perception and Charity: Many Americans participate in charitable donations, contributing an estimated $617 billion in 2025, showing a high level of community support. Critics argue, however, that current welfare systems may perpetuate dependency rather than foster independence and self-sufficiency, despite a consistent poverty rate.

Overall Economic Context: While military spending is often highlighted, U.S. welfare spending exceeds that of several other nations collectively. This raises questions about the efficiency and effectiveness of welfare versus military funding.

While military spending garners significant attention, the reality is that welfare expenditures far exceed defense costs. This contradicts the belief that military budgets hinder social support. The ongoing debate questions whether increasing welfare spending truly helps alleviate poverty in the long term, emphasizing a need for a balanced perspective on government spending priorities. 

https://pjmedia.com/davidhasanyi/2026/09/04/we-spend-a-lot-more-on-welfare-than-bombs-and-thats-a-problem-n4956911

The Democrats’ War on Children: A Systematic Assault On Innocence, Family, And The Future Of America

 Terry O'Brien, presents a critique of Democratic policies regarding children in America. It argues that there is a concerted effort by Democrats to undermine innocence and parental authority through various actions and policies.

Abortion: The article claims that Democrats support access to abortion, even late-term, and advocate for minors to obtain abortions without parental notification. This is described as a disregard for the unborn.

Sexualization in Education: It argues that children are being exposed to explicit sexual content in schools, with drag queens discussing mature topics with young students and LGBTQ+ clubs being formed without parental consent. Parents who voice concerns are often dismissed or investigated.

Medical Transition for Minors: The article details how some states allow minors to receive medications for gender transition without parental consent, resulting in harmful medical procedures. It criticizes the promotion of these practices as neglecting children’s well-being.

Critical Race Theory (CRT): The author alleges that CRT is taught in schools under the guise of history and that it spreads division among children by framing them as either oppressors or victims.

Government Overreach: There are claims that government authorities label dissenting parents as domestic terrorists and that schools are not transparent about social transitions or explicit curriculums.

Child Exploitation through Immigration: The article describes how unaccompanied migrant children are at risk of being exploited and trafficked in the United States, attributing this to lax immigration policies.

Call to Action: The article urges parents to reclaim authority in education and protect children from perceived threats by voting, participating in school boards, and rejecting harmful policies.

The article encapsulates a viewpoint that sees current Democratic policies as detrimental to children and families. It encourages adults to take action to safeguard the rights and innocence of the younger generation, portraying the situation as a critical battle for the future of America. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/09/the-democrats-war-on-children-a-systematic-assault-on-innocence-family-and-the-future-of-america/

Trump signs EO designed to overhaul the American beef processing industry

 President Donald Trump has signed an executive order aimed at reforming the American beef processing industry to encourage competition and support independent producers.

The order seeks to reduce regulatory barriers for local farmers, enabling them to process and sell their meat directly across state lines.

It targets issues in the meat supply chain caused by large corporations’ control and aims to lower food prices for consumers.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture will streamline inspection processes, making it easier for smaller operations to compete.

The order also focuses on preventing price-fixing and promoting transparency in cattle pricing to ensure fair earnings for ranchers.

The administration believes these reforms will ultimately lower retail beef prices and strengthen national food security, although building independent processing facilities may take time.

https://www.oann.com/newsroom/trump-signs-eo-designed-to-overhaul-the-american-beef-processing-industry/

A Decade Long Food Fight Comes to a Head as Joel Salatin Calls for a "Food Emancipation Proclamation"

 By Staff The following article is based on a speech delivered by Joel Salatin at Hillsdale College titled "A Parallel Food System Alr...