David Bell discusses the implications of Universal Basic Income (UBI) and its potential negative effects on society. Through his observations and experiences, he raises concerns about the loss of purpose and dignity among individuals who may become entirely reliant on government support without the motivation to work.
The Connection Between UBI and Social Issues
• Bell recounts experiences in communities primarily supported by government handouts and mining royalties, highlighting poor living conditions and lack of motivation among residents.
• UBI can lead to a loss of dignity, disinterest in the world, and increased substance abuse, contributing to a cycle of neglect and violence within families.
• This scenario is not just theoretical; it is evident in various cultures where dependence on handouts has replaced self-sufficiency.
UBI in a Technological Era
• Bell warns that many 'developed' countries are moving towards implementing UBI as automation and artificial intelligence (AI) remove jobs.
• Companies like Amazon are increasingly relying on AI for greater profits, which will lead to higher unemployment rates and create a need for government assistance.
Government Program Design and Control
• Future UBI could be distributed as a form of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), controlling how recipients can spend their money.
• The establishment of CBDCs may lead to a loss of individual autonomy, with spending restricted by governmental dictates.
Perception of UBI as a Positive Development
• Many people see UBI as a virtuous solution, believing it will benefit society. However, Bell argues it could merely create new forms of dependency.
• Restrictions on what recipients can buy with their assistance may further limit their autonomy.
Master-Slave Relationship Dynamics
• Bell draws parallels between dependent citizens and slavery; governments may control citizens' lives in the name of societal welfare.
• Actions perceived as protests against the government may result in loss of rights, reinforcing this master-slave dynamic.
A Dystopian Future
• Bell suggests that most will not view the erosion of personal freedoms as dystopian; they will accept it under the guise of protection from societal issues like climate change or pandemics.
• The design behind UBI and CBDCs may ultimately privilege a small elite, while the majority may choose the ease of dependency over the struggles of independence.
Need for a Conversation on UBI
• There is an urgent need for society to have discussions about UBI, recognizing the potential for it to lead to societal decay rather than progress.
• Bell argues that while social safety nets are necessary, UBI as a replacement for productive work could hinder economic autonomy and prosperity.
Historical Context
• Bell notes that past societies escaped feudalistic structures, emphasizing the importance of maintaining economic autonomy and purpose to avoid regression into similar forms of dependence.
• The acceptance or rejection of UBI will shape the future of societal structure, with the risk that many will prefer the comforts of dependency over the challenges of striving for improvement.
Bell warns that without meaningful dialogue regarding UBI, society risks drifting back into forms of oppression disguised as safety nets. The discussion around UBI is crucial to ensure that it does not become a tool for maintaining dependency and stagnation, but rather a means for empowering individuals to realize their potential and maintain their dignity within a thriving society.
https://brownstone.org/articles/universal-basic-income-make-slavery-great-again/
No comments:
Post a Comment