Skip to main content

Posts

US strikes hard against the Sinaloa Cartel: Sanctions six individuals and seven entities, blocking its financial network.

 On April 4, 2025, the U. S. Treasury Department announced sanctions against the Sinaloa Cartel, hitting its financial network hard by targeting key individuals and entities involved in money laundering. • The U. S. Treasury, led by Secretary Scott Bessent, imposed sanctions on six individuals and seven entities linked to the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. • These sanctions are intended to disrupt a money laundering network that relies on front companies along the U. S. -Mexico border, facilitating cash transfers and currency exchanges. • The Sinaloa Cartel has been recognized as a foreign terrorist organization, heavily involved in trafficking fentanyl, contributing to significant death tolls in the U. S. • Bessent emphasized that the cartel’s operations are fueled by laundered money, which he called the “lifeblood” of their crime empire. • The actions are part of a broader strategy to confront drug cartels under the Trump administration, which also designated several other criminal...
Post a Comment
Read more
Recent posts

Democrats Activate NGO Machine For Weekend Color Revolution Operation Against Trump

The Democratic Party is facing low favorability among Americans and has initiated a domestic color revolution with the support of billionaire-funded NGOs. This operation, currently focused on President Trump, involves protests labeled "Hands Off! " taking place across the nation. A website for this movement indicates backing from 186 various leftist organizations and unions. Historically, color revolutions have been used for regime change overseas by US intelligence agencies and have appeared domestically before, like during the BLM protests. The current effort aims to influence public sentiment against Trump, akin to past tactics. However, challenges exist due to frozen grants and the recent integration of USAID into the State Department, which may hinder their plans for a taxpayer-funded revolution. The situation is evolving, and the Democrats are poised for a contentious summer.  https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democrats-activate-ngo-machine-weekend-color-revolution-op...
Post a Comment
Read more

Taibbi: How An Obama Executive Order Led To The Censorship Industrial Complex

 During a recent House Foreign Affairs subcommittee hearing, Matt Taibbi discussed how an executive order from Obama has contributed to a framework that enables censorship, particularly in digital spaces. Taibbi highlighted the evolution of government censorship from targeting international threats to domestic individuals. 1. Executive Order Details: • Obama signed Executive Order 13721 on March 14, 2016, aimed at countering terrorist messaging through the establishment of the Global Engagement Center (GEC). • Initially focused on international terrorist organizations, the GEC's focus shifted towards domestic communications. 2. GEC's Influence on Social Media: • Taibbi discovered emails linking GEC officials and Twitter executives discussing various topics, including COVID-19, the 2020 election, and Donald Trump, indicating a shift from external threats to domestic accounts. • Examples show GEC pressuring Twitter to limit content from Americans labeled as misinformation, includ...
Post a Comment
Read more

No, The Senate Shouldn’t Let Even More Unaccountable Bureaucrats Decide What The Law Says

A discussion is underway regarding whether Senate Republicans should allow a shift in legislative power to the Senate parliamentarian and government bureaucrats. This stems from recent actions taken by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under President Biden, which have sparked significant debate over regulatory authority. 1. Legislative Authority: • The central question is who should decide the meaning of statutes in Congress. It is argued that Congress itself should maintain this power and not delegate it to external entities like the Senate parliamentarian. 2. California’s Waivers: • The issue arises from waivers granted to California under the Clean Air Act, which are believed to negatively impact the automotive and fossil fuel industries, affecting consumer choices and state policies. 3. Historical Context: • Previous administrations, such as Trump's, have used the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to challenge executive rules. Recently, Congress has disapproved several Bi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Here’s How The Media Are Lying Right Now: Tariffs ‘A Tax On Consumers’ Edition

The article discusses how media portrays recent tariffs imposed by the Trump administration and the varying opinions on their effects on consumers and the economy. 1. Media Simplification: The media often reduces complex economic issues like tariffs to simple statements, mainly stating that "tariffs hurt working people" and "costs are passed to consumers. " 2. Reported Consequences: Various news outlets emphasize that Trump's tariffs will primarily impact lower-income households, leading to increased consumer prices. 3. Economic Insights: While tariffs may raise prices, the article notes that this does not guarantee that prices will increase for consumers. Several potential outcomes are possible, including reduced consumer demand as prices rise. 4. Purpose of Tariffs: The administration argues tariffs are designed to counteract trade deficits and encourage domestic manufacturing, as companies currently prefer cheaper labor and production abroad. 5. Potential Rea...
Post a Comment
Read more

Supreme Court rules Trump administration can cancel $65 million in teaching grants

 The U. S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration can cancel $65 million in education grants linked to diversity initiatives. This decision comes amidst ongoing legal battles regarding the administration's actions. • The ruling was a close 5-4 decision, lifting a temporary block imposed by a federal judge in Boston. • The court's majority ruling supports the Trump administration's efforts to eliminate these grants while litigation continues. • Chief Justice John Roberts and three liberal justices dissented against the majority ruling. • The Trump administration has faced challenges from federal courts in its attempts to end various grants and contracts. The Supreme Court's ruling allows the Trump administration to proceed with canceling the $65 million in education grants, which is part of a broader effort to change policies related to diversity and inclusion in education. Further legal proceedings on this matter are expected. https://justthenews.com/gove...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mr. Schumer — You Make No Sense!

In an article by Richard Blakley, Senator Chuck Schumer is criticized for his comments on President Trump's tariff approach to addressing the national debt crisis. The author highlights Schumer's long tenure and the dramatic increase in the national debt during his time in office. • Schumer described Trump's tariff idea as harmful and nonsensical while Blakley argues the opposite. • Schumer has been in the Senate since 1999 and led the Democrat caucus and was majority leader, yet the U. S. national debt has drastically increased from a $126 billion surplus in 1999 to $36. 68 trillion in 2025. • Blakley questions whom Schumer represents, given the large national debt burden on citizens ($107,244 per person and $323,048 per taxpayer). • The author expresses frustration that senators cannot be removed from office and suggests starting with their salaries to address the debt crisis. • The vast debt is illustrated with comparisons, like how it could make 36 million people millio...
Post a Comment
Read more